As always, the contents of this blog constitute a compendium of multiple media reports supplemented by my personal opinion where indicated.
I have published multiple blogs describing the Dem’s pre-election gaslighting. Some of you may recall the essence of it, but I suspect an equal number of you will not. In any event, I am repeating it because it is a critical topic in what I believe is the most crucial and transformative election in my lifetime to date.
It happens every election cycle like clockwork. It is one of the few things upon which we can rely along with death, taxes and the sun rising in the east and setting in the west. Of course, I am referring to DSA pre-election gaslighting. I know all politicians shade the truth, exaggerate and obfuscate to a degree. Otherwise, they wouldn’t get elected. However, what the far left Dems have habitually done and will continue to do is far more extreme than that. They do it every election cycle, and aided and abetted by a compliant mainstream media and an apathetic voting public, it is often successful. So prepare yourself to be bombarded with an array of “I was misquoted;” “those comments were taken out of context,” “what I really meant was….,” and my favorite, “my position on that has evolved.” In my view the classic case of gaslighting in recent years was perpetrated by Abigail Spanberger, the current governor of Virginia. She ran as a moderate, but soon after taking office this past January she commenced to govern as a radical lefty. She isn’t the only one either, just the one that sticks in my mind.
In the past year the neo-communists on the radical left have become emboldened. Many of them are no longer reticent about their intentions. They have come right out and told us. For example, in his 2025 mayorial campaign Zohran Mamdani freely touted his radical policies, many of which could have been written by Karl Marx, as well as his strong anti-Israel/antisemitic opinions. Despite that and despite the fact that NYC has a Jewish population of some 960,000, which comprises about 12% of the city’s population, inexplicably, he won handily.
As the radicals in the DEM party have become more aggressive, at the same time the moderates have become more reticent. I believe as do many other observers that they are afraid of being primaried. They don’t realize that regardless of how far “left” they go it will never be enough for these radicals. They will be primaried anyway. This situation reminds me of an analogy. A man is confronted by a wild lion that he is afraid will eat him. So, he keeps feeding the lion to delay it from happening. Unfortunately, eventually he will run out of meat, and the lion will eat him anyway.
Schumer and Jeffries have been claiming that the Dem Party has a “big tent,” and the radicals are welcome to share it. That sharing will never last. History tells us that appeasement never works. An aggressor will continue to take, take, and take some more until he confronted and thwarted. Either they are incredibly naive and dumb, or they think we are. As I wrote in my blog “The Camel’s Nose” eventually the radicals will take over.
In case you have forgotten or only watch CNN and MSNBC below please find some of the radicals’ inane agenda items. I have included them in previous blogs, but perhaps a refresher is needed. I’m not making them up. They have been published, and they are available to anyone who wants to bother to research them.
- Abolish the Senate and the office of the President.
- Expand the membership of the Supreme Court and reduce its powers.
- Abolish the electoral college.
- Open our borders to any and all who want to emigrate.
- Release all prisoners.
- Abolish ICE.
- Universal cradle to grave medical insurance administered by the federal government.
- Government takeover of the education system.
- Government takeover of all private property.
- Terminate foreign aid to Israel.
- Tax the rich and even the not so rich.
- Redisbute wealth from the “haves” to the “have nots.”
The DSA and the media are not publicizing these because 90% of the voters would be appalled and would not approve of most of them. They are perpetuating a massive deception along the lines of the “Trojan Horse.” To me, any and all DSA candidates are married to these policies whether they have espoused them or not. Many of them are unworkable, illegal and/or would bankrupt the country, but they don’t care.
Currently, two of the most prominant races involve Abdul El-Sayed and James Talerico, who are running for US Senate in MI and TX, respectively. As I write this a survey by The Hill shows El-Sayed with a slight lead over his Repub opponent Mike Rogers, and a survey of likely voters in TX has disclosed that Talerico is in a dead heat with his Repub opponent. In light of the foregoing DSA platform these results defy all logic. I can only attribute it to gaslighting the voters.
Both men have said things in the past that they now want to walk back. When they said them they were unknown and few people paid them any attention. Now, that they are running for high office people are scrutinizing them, and a substantial majority would disagree. Since the comments are on tape they can’t deny them they now claim they have “reassessed” their opinions. In reality they really believed those positions and still do. They don’t regret saying what they said. They just regret they were uncovered.
El-Sayed’s well-publicized close relationship with Hasan Piker, a rabid antisemite political commentator, is a good example of the foregoing. Heretofore, even the hint of such a relationship would have damaged his campaign beyond repair. Lately he has been trying to distance himself from Piker, but Piker, himself has been confirming and reconfirming their relationship. I don’t see how he can do it, but on the other hand the voters don’t seem to care. In fact, many of them probably view it as a plus.
In addition to the above radical agenda items I wonder how many voters in MI, where the economy is heavily dependent upon automobiles with internal combustion engines, are cognizant of the fact that El-Sayed (1) has repeatedly stated his preference for electric vehicles over gas, (2) has said that if one wants to achieve the “American Dream” move to Canada, and (3) has advocated banning fireworks on the 4th of July. These comments are a matter of record, and now that he realizes they are unpopular he is attempting to “walk them back.” Of course, the compliant media has not pressed him as to what led him to change his opinion, but it’s obvious to me and many others. Similarly, James Talerico has been trying to “walk back” past comments such as “capitalism is oppressive,” “there are six genders,” and his preference for vegan food over beef.
Conclusion
As always, the Dems will be running on negativism and hate, hate for Trump, hate for Israel, hate for Jews, and hate for America and the American way of life. They will denote the rate of inflation, in particular, the rising costs of food, oil, and healthcare. Historically, cost of living has been the most important issue for voters, so unless things change in the next two months this will be damaging to the Repubs.
They will question President Trump’s prosecution of the war against Iran ignoring the fact that its purpose was to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear capability, which has been achieved. They will accuse Israel of genocide in the ME ignoring the human rights violations of the Islamic terrorists in the region. All the while they will not be able to offer any viable solutions. They don’t really want to solve any of these problems; they just crave power, and once they achieve it, they will not relinquish it.
Unfortunately, the issues regarding the economy are painful and tangible. People experience them every day. On the other hand, depriving Iran of a nuclear weapon is intangible. It’s not something people can see, feel, touch or experience, although I would argue that it holds more significance. In addition, Trump’s actions to bring down the price of oil, which will jumpstart the economy, will not be felt until after the election.
Even though President Trump is not on the ballot personally his policies are. If the Dems gain control of even one house of Congress his entire program will cease. Once again, we will be subjected to endless investigations and another impeachment. Nothing will get accomplished for the remainder of the second term.
Finally, as I have written in previous blogs, in my opinion this election will be the most critical one in my lifetime. It is about much more than the usual issues. It is about America itself. Do we want to retain our way of life that has stood for 250 years, namely capitalism, free enterprise, individualism and a free society under the protection of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, or do we want to tear it all down and slide into the abyss of communism. Make no mistake. That is the goal of the radical DSA neo-communists. Change would be gradual and largely unnoticeable to most people, but make no mistake, once we enter onto that slippery slope there will be no turning back.
We Built It Blog by Larry Jacob 