PRESIDENTS’ DAY

Monday, February 16, the US will celebrate Presidents’ Day, or will it? As you will see, the holiday is replete with quirks and contradictions.

Firstly, according to Wikipedia, the moniker, “Presidents’ Day,” is actually a colloquialism.  The official name of the federal holiday is “Washington’s Birthday,” which was promulgated by Congress and never changed.  Therefore, although the day is commonly referred to as “Presidents’ Day” the official federal holiday name remains “Washington’s Birthday.”

Secondly, again according to Wikipedia although the day is also celebrated as a state holiday in most states various alternative names are used. Some examples include “President’s Day,” “Washington’s Birthday,” and “Washington’s-Lincoln’s Birthday,” among others. There is no mail. Federal and state offices, the courts, the DMV, banks and financial markets are all closed. Most public schools are closed. Some even take the entire week off as a winter recess.

The story of Presidents’ Day date began in 1800. Following GW’s death in 1799, his February 22 birthday became a perennial day of remembrance. At the time, Washington was venerated as the most important figure in American history, and events like the 1832 centennial of his birth and the commencement of the construction of the Washington Monument in 1848 were cause for national celebration.

While Washington’s Birthday was an unofficial observance for most of the 1800s, it was not until the late 1870s that it became a federal holiday. Arkansas Senator Stephen Wallace Dorsey was the first to propose it, and President Rutherford B. Hayes signed it into law in 1879. Initially, the holiday initially only applied to the District of Columbia, but by 1885 it had expanded to the whole country.

As most of you know, GW was actually born on February 22, so the holiday never falls on his actual birthday.  Except, the year GW was born, 1731, the British Empire, including the American Colonies, was still using the Old-Style Julian calendar, which was eleven days behind the modern Gregorian calendar, which became the standard in 1752.  So, technically, GW was born on February 11, 1732 (Old Style). Confused?  Join the club.  Read on; it gets more complicated.

As I said above, Congress first promulgated the federal holiday honoring GW in 1879.  Fittingly, GW was the first and only President to be so honored.  It was celebrated on February 22.  In 1951 a gentleman named Harold Fischer formed a committee with the apt name of the “President’s Day National Committee,” of which he became the National Executive Director, for the purpose of honoring, not a particular president, but the office, itself. There was sentiment for designating March 4 as the date since that was the original presidential inauguration date. Alas, Congress did not approve the proposal, although many states did declare March 4 as such.

At this point some states, which had been celebrating a separate holiday on Abraham Lincoln’s Birthday, February 12, combined it with GW’s BD to create “Presidents’ Day.” It should be noted that Lincoln’s BD, though celebrated as a state holiday in many states, has never been designated as a Federal Holiday.

Finally, in 1971 Congress clarified matters with the “Uniform Monday Holiday Act” the purpose of which was to create three-day holiday weekends. It wanted to promulgate a holiday that would honor both GW and Abraham Lincoln, whom most historians recognize (as do I) as our two best presidents. The holiday was moved to the third Monday in February and renamed “Presidents’ Day,” which, as I have said, falls in between AL’s (February 12) and GW’s (February 22) birthdays. It has remained as such ever since. People like it because it provides a built-in three-day weekend, and retailers like it because customers could spend the extra day off shopping in their stores.

Still confused? Almost done, but there’s more. For example:

1. Today, the holiday is commonly referred to as a plural (“Presidents’ Day”) to honor all presidents, both past and present, not only AL and GW, although as mentioned above the official name as established by Congress and never changed for some reason is “Washington’s Birthday.”

2. The day is not a universal holiday, and it does not have a universal name in all states.

3. States that do observe the holiday recognize over a dozen variations, such as “President’s Day,” “Presidents’ Day,” “George Washington/Thomas Jefferson Birthday,” “Lincoln/Washington/Presidents Day,” “George Washington’s Birthday,” and “George Washington’s Birthday and Daisy Gatson Bates Day” (who?), among others.

4. Since 1862 the US Senate has observed the tradition of reciting GW’s Farewell Address on his BD.

5. Currently, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky Louisiana, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Wisconsin do not observe the holiday at all. Other states also celebrate it differently or at other times. For example: (a) Massachusetts celebrates “Presidents Day” on May 29 in honor of four specific presidents. Quiz question #1. Can you name them? Three are easy. They were born in the state and were well-accomplished, aside from being president. The fourth, who was more obscure, was born in a neighboring state, but served as MA governor before becoming president. Kudos if you can name all four. See answer below. (b) New Mexico celebrates the holiday on the Friday after Thanksgiving. (c) Georgia celebrates the day on Christmas Eve. (d) Indiana also celebrates it on Christmas Eve, or the previous workday. (e) GW’s adopted city of Alexandria, VA holds celebrations throughout the entire month of February, including what is billed as the nation’s longest running and largest George Washington Birthday parade.” (f) The city of Eustis, FL boasts a “GeorgeFest” celebration, which dates back to 1902. and (g) In Colorado, it’s actually not officially called any of those. The state statute identifying holidays lists it as “the third Monday in February, commonly called Washington-Lincoln day.”

As I said above, the holiday is replete with quirks and contradictions.

Other quiz questions

2. Which popular food is traditionally consumed on this day?

3. Which medal did GW create for the “common soldier?”

CONCLUSION

I cannot conclude this blog without commenting on the “cancel culture” movement, which has, to a large extent, been taking over our lives.  Under the Trump presidency this movement has attenuated somewhat, but I believe that under a different president it could be resurrected.

In particular, personally, I find the movement to wipe out the legacies of past presidents, such as GW, AL, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and others to be ill-advised, distasteful, misguided, and just plain wrong.  Those who would do so are demonstrating a severe ignorance of our history and are pursuing a radical political agenda that is not shared by the vast majority of Americans.  When and if it recurs, the majority should resist strenuously.

These individuals were heroes.  They helped to forge and sustain this nation.  No one is saying they were perfect.  No one is.  Everyone has flaws.  Yes, many of them owned slaves, fought against indigenous peoples, or did something else objectionable to some present-day persons when viewed in retrospect.  However, it is important to recognize that they were a product of their times.  It is a historical fact, for instance, that before the Civil War it was very common to own slaves, even in the northern states.  Even some Blacks owned slaves.  We cannot and should not apply our present-day standards and mores to people who lived in another time.

Quiz answers: 1) John Adams, John Quincy Adams, JFK, and Calvin Coolidge
2) Cherry pie, for obvious reasons.
3) The Purple Heart for being wounded in combat.

PS. Daisy Gatson Bates was a civil rights activist who played a leading role in the integration of Arkansas’ public schools in the late 1950s.

VOTER ID LAWS

As always, the following is gleaned from a compendium of multiple media accounts supplemented by my personal opinion, where indicated.

Once again, the Dems are espousing the wrong side of an 80-20 issue. It should be surprising that they keep finding themselves in this position, but it seems to be their modus operandi. It seems that they can’t help themselves. Their TDS overrules all rationality. Anything President Trump is for they must be against regardless of the will of the people. The current issue is whether or not a person should be required to produce proper identification in order to vote.

Before 2006, no state required a person to present ID in order to vote. However, in 2006 Indiana became the first state to pass a law requiring voters to produce ID at the polls. Its legality was challenged, but eventually, the Supreme Court upheld this requirement as long as the laws were “neutral and did not significantly burden voters.” According to Wikipedia currently thirty-six states have implemented voter ID laws with varying degrees of stringency. The other 14 states plus Washington D.C. still allow voting without ID. Support for voter ID laws is often fueled by concerns over voter fraud. A 2013 poll disclosed that 43% of voters believed that voter fraud was “relatively common,” and a 2010 survey revealed that some 80% of respondents supported some form of ID requirement.  At the present time various polls have reported bilateral support. Some 80% of the public, including some 70% of Dems, support voter ID laws.

Critics of strict voter ID laws argue that they disproportionately affect minority, low-income, and elderly populations. Furthermore, they claim it is a “non-issue” as voter ID fraud is “exceedingly rare.” I don’t subscribe to these arguments. Our history is replete with instances of elections whose results were tainted by suspicions of voter irregularities, if not outright fraud. For example, for years there were suspicions that “machines” such as NYC’s Tammany Hall perpetrated such irregularities. In the 1960s it was suspected that Chicago Mayor Richard Daley padded Dem votes. The joke was that in Chicago even dead people voted. The 2000 presidential election results were tainted by irregularities such as the infamous “hanging chads” in Florida. Eventually the Supreme Court had to weigh in. To this day, many Gore supporters insist he was the real winner. Most recently many Trump supporters have questioned the validity of the 2020 presidential election.

The arguments against voter ID laws had some validity in the South during the “Jim Crow” period when voter suppression of Blacks was common. Nowadays, I don’t believe that is an issue. In fact, many minorities view the Dems’ opposition to voter ID as an insult and racist in and of itself. The implication is that Dem politicians such as Chuck Schumer, Kamala Harris and Jamie Raskin, to name a few, consider minorities and women to be incapable obtaining a valid ID via the DMV or the internet. Schumer has even characterized voter ID laws such as the Trump sponsored SAVE America Act as “Jim Crow 2.0.” Pollsters who have queried minorities regarding this matter have generally been met with puzzlement or indignation.

Let’s be honest. We all know the real reason for the Dems’ opposition. They want legions of non-citizens to be able to vote. They feel that most of them would vote Democrat in order to continue to get freebies from the government, and that would result in Dems having a better chance to win elections. I and many others firmly believe that that was one of the reasons why they pursued the open borders policy during the Biden Administration.

Conclusion

Voter ID requirements are necessary in order to engender confidence that elections are fair and equitable. Furthermore, one is required to produce ID for a myriad of routine activities in everyday life such as driving a car, flying on an airplane, gaining employment, applying for or receiving government benefits, getting a marriage license, and age-restricted purchases such as alcohol or cigarettes. Why not for voting, which in my view is the most important act for a citizen.

Fair and equitable elections are one of the cornerstones of our democracy. If the public does not have confidence in election results our entire system of government would dissipate.

SUPER BOWL QUIZ 2026

Super Bowl LX will be contested on Sunday, February 8, 2026 between the Seattle Mariners and the New England Patriots at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, CA.

Below please find my annual quiz. It may be too difficult for casual or non-football fans, but I have to challenge the hard-core football fans. You know who you are.

Remember, no peeking at the internet. Don’t ask Siri or Alexa.

1. The first Super Bowl was played in what year?

a. 1966
b. 1967
c. 1968
d. 1969

2. The losing team in the first SB was:

a. Cowboys
b. Raiders
c. Giants
d. Chiefs

3. How many different major cities (or their environs) have hosted a Super Bowl?

a. 10
b. 12
c. 15
d. 19

4. Miami has hosted 11 SBs, which is tied for the most with which city?

a. Phoenix
b. Dallas
c. Los Angeles
d. New Orleans

5. Super Bowl 2025 was played in which city area?  

a. Los Angeles
b. Las Vegas
c. Dallas
d. Miami

6. Two franchises are tied with the most SB wins, 6. One is New England. Which is the other?

a. Dallas
b. San Francisco
c. Pittsburg
d. New England

7. Each of the following teams is undefeated in SBs except:

a. Jets
b. Ravens
c. Bucs
d. Green Bay

8. The name “Super Bowl” was derived from:

a. College “bowl” games
b. Fan vote
c. Media feedback
d. Child’s toy

9. Other than Patrick Mahomes, who was the only other quarterback to start and win a Super Bowl with the Kansas City Chiefs? 

a. Trent Green
b. Bill Kenney
c. Joe Kapp
d. Len Dawson

10. Who was the only MVP from the losing team?

a. Chuck Howley
b. Len Dawson
c. Bruce Smith
d. Icky Woods

11. How many defensive players have been MVP of a SB?

a. Two
b. Five
c. Ten
d. Twelve

12. Which franchise lost four consecutive Super Bowls? 
a. Green Bay
b. San Francisco
c. Buffalo
d. Pittsburg

13. Who was the headline performer at halftime last year?

a. Kendrick Lamar
b. Bruce Springsteen
c. Usher
d. Lady Gaga

14. Each of the following has not appeared in a SB, except:

a. Browns
b. Bengals
c. Lions
d. Jaguars

15. Which of these outstanding QBs has never won a SB?

a. John Elway
b. Steve Young
c. Dan Marino
d. Troy Aikman

16. How many times has a team played the SB in its home stadium?

a. 0
b. 1
c. 2
d. 3

17. Who is the only player to win three consecutive Super Bowls?

a. Ken Norton, Jr.
b. Bob Lilly
c. W. K. Hicks
d. Robert Jackson

18. The coldest temperature for a SB held outdoors was 39 degrees in which city?

a. Houston
b. New Orleans
c. New York
d. Cleveland

19. How many head coaches have won the SB for more than one franchise?

a. 0
b. 1
c. 2
d. 3

20. Who is the only kick/punt returner to win the SB MVP?

a. Desmond Howard
b. Kadarius Toney
c. Herb Adderly
d. Julian Edelman

21. The TV audience for SB I was approximately 65 million (on two networks, (CBS and NBC). Approximately how many people are expected to watch Super Bowl LX on Sunday?

a. 110 million
b. 128 million
c. 188 million
d. 200 million

22. After whom is the SB trophy named?

a. Pete Rozelle
b. Paul Brown
c. Al Davis
d. Vince Lombardi

23. Tom Brady has won the most SB rings (7). What player is next?

a. Adam Vinatieri
b. Charles Haley
c. Terry Bradshaw
d. Bob Lilly

24. The face value of a ticket to SB LC is . What was the face value of a ticket to SB I?

a. $1,000
b. $10,000
c.  $12
d. $10

25. What marginal player became famous for the “helmet catch” in SBXLII (Giants vs. Pats)?

a. Plaxico Burris
b. Randy Moss
c. David Tyree
d. Bob Schnelker

Bonus question: Who were the first two franchises in the NFL? 

Answer: Chicago Cardinals (now the Arizona Cardinals) and the Decatur Staleys (now the Chicago Bears). Commenced in 1920.

QUIZ ANSWERS: 1. b; 2. d; 3. d; 4. d; 5. b; 6. c; 7. d; 8. d; 9. d; 10. a (SB V); 11.c; 12. c; 13. a; 14. b; 15. c; 16. c; 17. a; 18. b; 19. a; 20. a, (244 total return yards, including a 99-yard kickoff return for a touchdown) ; 21. b; 22. d; 23. b(5); 24. c; 25. c

Well, there you have it. Let me know your score.

Enjoy the game. For what it’s worth, my prediction is Seattle 28 – NE 24.

CLUELESS CELEBRITIES

The content of this blog is a compendium of multiple media reports supplemented by my own opinion, where indicated.

I don’t know about you, but I, for one, am sick and tired of clueless celebrities spouting their opinions on serious issues, offering unsolicited, often inane advice on how we should live our lives. You see them on tv or read about them virtually every day. They continually feel the need to opine on every “hot” issue, no doubt to feed their massive egos. Their latest target is ICE’s roundup of illegal immigrants, but there have been many others too numerous to mention them all as they flit from issue to issue.

They speak out authoritatively without the foggiest idea of what they are talking about. They don’t comprehend that no one values their opinion anymore. Many of them are “has beens” anyway looking to become relevant again, to resurrect their careers. They may be great at acting, singing, athletics or whatever, but when it comes to real life issues, they are clueless.

They advise the rest of us on how to live our lives. I don’t need to take advice on serious life issues from the likes of Jane Fonda (aka “Hanoi Jane”), Molly Ringwald (who hasn’t had a “hit” movie in forever), George Clooney, LeBron James, Bruce Springsteen, Chuck Schumer, or Lady Gaga, among many others. When do you suppose was the last time one of them shopped for food or gassed up their car? They have no conception of the cost of feeding or sheltering their family. They are insulated from crime behind their walled communities and personal security teams. I doubt any of them have ever met an immigrant, legal or illegal, unless he/she was a caregiver or gardener. I have two words of advice for them: “SHUT UP!”

Conclusion

I just had to get that off my chest. Thanks for listening. Do any of you feel the same way? I’d like to know.

LAWLESSNESS IN MINNEAPOLIS

As always, the contents of this blog are a compendium of multiple media reports supplemented by my personal opinion, where indicated.

Note in the title of this blog I said “lawlessness,” not “protests” nor “demonstrations” nor some other bland characterization. More about the reason for that choice of words below.

Like most people, I am sorry to see any loss of life, especially when it is preventable. I offer my condolences to the families of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti. Their deaths were very preventable and regrettable.

That said, I am not interested in the details of their killings. I’m not interested in ascribing blame to a particular party nor determining who was to blame at the scene, who instigated the incidents, who did what to whom, etc. Furthermore, I have no interest in reading any more about what kind of person Hand and Pretti were or the actions and motives of the ICE personnel. I don’t want to get lost in the weeds regarding these killings. I am sick and tired of the self-serving politicizing by the media and various politicians who clearly have their own agendas. As far as I am concerned these were two unfortunate incidents for which all parties bear some responsibility.

Keep in mind Hand and Pretti were not engaged in peaceful demonstrations. Each willingly placed themselves in a dangerous, volatile situation and exacerbated it by their own actions. Everyone knows or should know that when a law enforcement person tells you to do something, such as move your car or show your hands, you comply, especially if the situation is tense and volatile and people are on edge. Also, what was Pretti doing spitting on ICE officers and kicking their car. I think he wanted to incite violence. The fact that he had a permit to carry a weapon is irrelevant.

In this case, like always, there were immediate causes and underlying causes. We all know the immediate causes, but in order comprehend fully what is occurring in Minneapolis one also has to be cognizant of the big picture, the “root causes,” if you will.

  1. For four years the Biden Administration opened our borders to everyone. It even encouraged illegal immigrants to emigrate unvetted. We all know the result. It is widely believed that as many as 18 million illegals entered the country, many of which were criminals, terrorists, drug dealers, and traffickers. No one really knows who they are, where they are, or their intent. Let’s be clear: just by entering the country they broke the law. It doesn’t matter if they became model citizens afterwards. Technically, they are illegals and criminals, and federal law authorizes them to be detained and deported.
  2. What we do know is that (1) many of them gravitated to various sanctuary jurisdictions throughout the country, such as Minneapolis, and (2) many of them have committed heinous crimes such as rape, murder, and assault on innocent Americans. While many Americans are focusing on the killings of Hand and Pretti, how about the many Americans that illegal aliens have victimized. For example, do you remember the heinous murders of Laken Reilly, Jocelyn Nungaray, Rachel Morin and Kayla Hamilton, each of whom was brutalized by illegal aliens who, in some cases had already committed multiple crimes in the US only to be released by from jail to repeat their criminal activities? The media seems to have forgotten them. The woke Dems seem to have forgotten them. Their deaths don’t fit their narrative. The perpetrators of crimes such as these are examples of the so-called “friends and neighbors” whom sanctuary jurisdictions like Minneapolis are protecting.
  3. DHS and ICE personnel were tasked to ferret out these criminals, detain them, and deport them. Plainly and simply, their actions are sanctioned by federal law. Local politicians, police and citizens should be helping them, not impeding them. At the very least when local police detain an illegal for any reason, they should notify ICE. ICE would then pick them up easily and peacefully. That is how it works in most areas of the country but not in Minneapolis and other sanctuary jurisdictions.
  4. By their actions and words Governor Walz, Mayor Frey and others have exacerbated the situation. They and others who oppose ICE or impede them in any way by words or deeds that result in inciting or committing violence are breaking federal law. Some would even characterize their actions as seditious.
  5. At the very least they have created, encouraged and exacerbated a volatile and dangerous situation where violence, even death, was almost inevitable. Therefore, they bear some responsibility for the deaths of Hand and Pretti. Even worse, they have done so for political reasons. They are not stupid (although one can argue that Walz is). They know the law. They are just playing to their radical left base.

Conclusion

As I said above, I am sick and tired of all the partisan blathering, bloviating and pandering by the Dem politicians and the mainstream media with respect to immigration. Let’s not forget three things: (1) Trump has a clear mandate from the American people to ferret out, detain and deport illegals. (2) His actions are sanctioned by federal law. (3) Federal law supersedes local law.

President Trump has been the only adult in the room regarding this situation. Realizing that the violence was not benefiting anyone and also the likelihood that it would spread to other locales he has delegated Tom Homan to meet with Walz and others to try to find a way to defuse the situation yet still accomplish the mission. Hopefully, the parties will agree on a plan to do so.

In my opinion, Walz, in particular, has another ulterior motive. He is aiming to distract attention away from the massive fraud that has been running rampant in his state under his watch. I have discussed this in detail in previous blogs, and there is no need to repeat it here. Suffice to say, the DOJ and Congress are already investigating, and his ploy will not work. He should be in prison. At the very least he should resign.

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ONE YEAR EVALUATION

The contents of this blog are a compendium of multiple media reports supplemented by my personal opinion where indicated.

President Trump rode into office with a decisive mandate. He garnered 312 Electoral College votes to Harris’ 226, won the popular vote with a plurality of 49.8%, the first Republican to do so since George W. Bush in 2004, and carried all seven swing states.

However, the hopes and expectations of the electorate were formidable. He was expected to, among other things, (1) secure the border, (2) deport the millions of illegals that had infiltrated our country under the Biden Administration, (3) protect us from terrorist attacks, both internal and external, (4) eliminate (or at least mitigate) the flow of drugs into the US and the power and influence of the drug cartels, (5) restore respect (and fear) of the USA viz a vis both our allies and our enemies, (6) eliminate Iran’s nuclear capabilities, (6) settle various conflicts and wars such as those in Gaza and Ukraine, (7) restore us to energy independence, (8) reduce inflation and (9) rehabilitate the economy. Furthermore, he was expected to accomplish all of the above while dealing with a hostile Dem Party and mainstream media that continually sought to undermine him at every turn. No problem, right?

So, after one year, to what extent has he fulfilled his mandate? Has he accomplished some, all, or none of the above goals? I’m sure you all have your own opinions and analyses. If nothing else, Trump is controversial. Read on for mine.

  1. Within the first few days of his tenure Trump executed hundreds of Executive Orders, many of which countermanded EOs that had been issued by former president Biden, to get the ball rolling. For example, one EO designated eight drug cartels and transnational organizations responsible for violent attacks as “Foreign Terrorist Organizations.” Those designations gave law enforcement officers wide latitude to combat these organizations.
  2. He focused on the cartels that had been disseminating cocaine, fentanyl and other deadly drugs throughout the US. Trump averred these cartels “functionally control[ling] — through a campaign of assassination, terror, rape and brute force — nearly all illegal traffic across the southern border of the United States.” Solutions have included increased border seizures, tougher prison sentences, offering rewards for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of narcotics traffickers, and blowing up “cigar boats’ on the open seas loaded with drugs.
  3. Through his “drill baby, drill” policy he reversed Biden-era drilling restrictions, approving nearly 6,000 applications for permits to drill for oil and gas even on federal and Native American land — a 55% increase from the same time period in 2024-2025.
  4. For years the Dems had insisted that the huge influx of illegal immigrants across our southern border could not be controlled without Congress’ passing new laws. Trump closed the border in a few weeks by applying EXISTING laws, which were not being enforced. His immigration policies as enforced by DHS, the DOJ and ICE have largely restored control over immigration for the first time in decades. They have reduced illegal border crossings to their lowest level since the 1970s, facilitated the removal of in excess of 2.6 million illegal aliens from the United States through arrests, detentions and deportations, both forcibly and voluntarily, prioritizing the “worst of the worst” – murders, rapists, gang members, and repeat offenders, led to negative net migration in 2025 for the first time in some 50 years, and reduced the trafficking of fentanyl and other dangerous drugs at the southern border by some 56%.
  5. He formed a new department, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) headed up by Elon Musk, to ferret out and eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government. According to the Office of Personnel Management by November 2025 DOGE had reduced the number of federal employees by some 317,000 through mass buyouts, terminations, and early retirements.
  6. In a remarkable display of military might and efficiency U.S. forces succeeded in capturing Venezuelan President Maduro without any loss of life and transporting him to the US to face justice for his crimes. The action was a military necessity since Maduro had been cozying up to China, Russia and Cuba, terrorizing his own people and through his socialist policies had been ruining the country’s economy. Trump declared that the U.S. would be taking control of Venezuela’s oil infrastructure temporarily and selling the oil for the benefit of Venezuelans, Americans and U.S. oil companies. Also, we sent a not-so-subtle message to the rest of the world that we were reinstituting the precepts of the Monroe Doctrine and had the military power to do so. Although the operation was a military success it will only be a political success if Venezuela manages to form a stable government to fill the current void in leadership.
  7. Trump promulgated an audacious tariff policy to reshape our international trade relations with other countries. He maintained that our trading partners had been ripping us off for decades by levying excessive tariffs on our products thereby hindering our exports. He made it clear that the US would no longer tolerate this practice. He negotiated more beneficial tariffs with virtually all of our trading partners.
  8. This policy has been controversial. It has raised some $300 billion for the country and stimulated foreign investment and construction of manufacturing plants in the US. On the other hand, critics claim that ultimately consumers will pay higher prices for some products. This opinion is consistent with survey results that three out of four Americans claim Trump isn’t focusing enough on lowering prices. Moreover, three out of four Americans complain that their income isn’t keeping up with inflation. More on this issue below. 
  9. He has been negotiating deals with certain pharmaceutical companies to bring down the prices of drugs for Americans.
  10. The financial markets have been climbing substantially. For example, the Dow Industrial Index has increased from 42,392 when Trump took office to 49,098 currently, an increase of 13%. This bodes well for the economy in 2026 and beyond since the financial markets are a leading economic indicator.
  11. His policies with respect to crime have resulted in the largest one-year decline in homicides in U.S. history. These policies focused on federal crime crackdowns, terminated the Biden Administration’s soft on crime policies, and reversed the nationwide violent crime surge of recent years. Rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults have declined by 6%, 19%, and 10%, respectively. In addition, the FBI has captured a record number of criminals on its Most Wanted List. In one year it exceeded the total of Biden’s all four years.
  12. All of the foregoing accomplishments are fine, but when people cast their votes on Election Day the paramount issue is always the economy. Voters are more concerned with how they will be able to provide for their family than the other issues I have discussed above. Trump is cognizant of this, and he has promulgated many policies to boost the economy.
  13. For example, he has reduced the price of gas at the pump to its lowest in five years. According to AAA the average price of a gallon of regular gas nationally is $2.89. Prices vary by region, with highs up to $4.50 in CA and lows of under $2.40 in the Gulf Coast area. 
  14. He has reduced inflation to a multiyear low chiefly by enforcing fiscal restraint and reversing the runaway spending that had characterized the Biden Presidency. Inflation peaked at 8% in 2022. The current level is 2.7%.
  15. He reduced mortgage rates to around 6%, which is the lowest in three years by stabilizing the mortgage-backed securities markets, reducing the Prime Rate, and expanding liquidity thus rendering buying a house affordable to more people.
  16. He passed the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” which will, among other things, provide a substantial boost to the economy through various tax cuts, the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime, tax reductions for seniors and other measures.
  17. He created “Trump Accounts” that will encourage families to establish tax-advantaged savings accounts for newborns.

Conclusion

Trump’s mantra has consistently been “America First,” and all of his actions have been aimed at that goal. As I said above some of his policies are controversial, and you may not agree with all of them. I, myself, have doubts about a few of them. I have discussed most of them in detail in previous blogs.

Overall, I maintain that Trump’s first year in office has been very successful. He inherited a chaotic situation, especially with respect to the economy. I say give him a chance to clean it up. The Big Beautiful Bill has many elements, particularly the tax cuts and rebates, that I feel will boost the economy. In my lifetime every set of tax cuts and rebates has done so. They just need a few months to work.

The 2026 off-year elections are looming. We all know that typically the president’s party loses congressional seats, sometimes a myriad of them. Trump still has much work to do to clean up the aforementioned mess that he inherited. If the Dems were to gain control of one or both Houses of Congress, it will be most unfortunate for the country. The Dems will likely block all of Trump’s initiatives and probably impeach him and others. Nothing of substance would be accomplished for the next two years.

INSURRECTION IN MINNEAPOLIS

This blog is a compendium of multiple media reports supplemented by my personal opinion where indicated.

Where is that bold, aggressive, daring president we elected? One of the major reasons he was elected was to locate, collect and deport the millions of illegal aliens that had infested the US during the Biden Administration. These people broke federal laws just by sneaking into the country. Many of them have been living quietly under the radar, but too many of them have committed heinous crimes in the US, such as rape and murder, and against children no less. Some are repeated offenders. Others have been soaking up social services meant for Americans such as Medicaid and hospital services. Most of the country is fed up and wants action.

Yes, his administration has deployed ICE personnel to roust illegals in various venues with much success, however, he has been strangely reluctant to deal decisively with the blatant insurrection in Minneapolis. In my opinion, this is completely out of character. It’s as if he went to sleep as one night as Donald Trump and woke up the next morning as Joe Biden (reminiscent of the movie, Big in which a 10-year-old boy wakes up one morning as Tom Hanks).

In recent years the country has become increasingly divided over the issue of illegal immigration. In particular ICE’s activities have become a major flashpoint among some people and in some areas of the country. Some states and cities have offered sanctuary to these illegals. Law enforcement officials have not been turning them over to ICE as the law requires. Instead, when they are detained, they simply release them. In addition, they actually inhibit ICE’s efforts to find them. Make no mistake. Granting sanctuary to illegals is contrary to federal law, and, as we know federal law supersedes state and local law. Otherwise, we have anarchy.

In Minneapolis the pro-illegal immigrant crowd has proceeded to a new level of resistance. They have gone way beyond mere peaceful demonstrations. They appear to be well-organized and well-funded. Many of them appear to be “professional agitators” who are paid to show up to protest any and all causes. Some may even be illegal aliens. Law enforcement officials need to follow the money and ascertain the identity of those who have been organizing and funding these protests.

They have taunted, physically attacked and doxed ICE personnel. They have destroyed federal property and even stolen sensitive federal documents and information. Yesterday, some even invaded at least one church and disrupted services. While doxing isn’t always a crime per se it becomes illegal when it becomes conjoined with criminal acts, such as stalking, harassment, threats, or incitement to violence, It is particularly insidious and dangerous in the current situation because the perpetrators have been employing it to disclose private information with “malicious intent to cause harm or fear” with respect to some ICE agents and their families.

Matters were exacerbated even further following the fatal shooting of a protester named Renee Good by an ICE official after she had hit him with her car. While no one wants to see a fatality, the empirical evidence indicates she was the instigator. Of course, each side has blamed the other.

Rather than trying to calm the situation MN Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, aided and abetted by much of the mainstream media, have, by their words and actions, openly incited more violence. They have caused local police to stand down and have left ICE personnel alone to deal with the protesters. They have stated repeatedly that they do not recognize ICE’s authority, and they want them expelled from their city and state. Clearly, their words and deeds are contraventions of federal law and are irresponsible and unconscionable. I see their actions as a direct challenge to federal authority not unlike the actions of the segregationist South before the Civil War and in the 1950s and 1960s.

This is classic insurrection. These people need to be put in their place NOW before other sanctuary areas become emboldened to follow suit.

The Insurrection Act dates back to 1807. It authorizes the president to deploy federal military troops inside the country to restore order and enforce the law if he determines that unrest or rebellion makes it impossible to enforce the law through the regular courts and police. According to most legal experts the Insurrection Act is only meant to be invoked in extreme situations, when normal law enforcement has broken down. In my view, the current situation in Minneapolis fits those parameters. The law does not clearly define what counts as an “insurrection” or “rebellion,” however, in 1827 the US Supreme Court opined that the president alone has the authority to decide when the law applies.

Trump haters may strenuously object to his use of the Act, but according to the Brennan Center for Justice it has been invoked 30 times in US history in response to various situations, including to enforce school desegregation in the 1950s and 1960s and during the 1992 Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers who had severely beaten Rodney King.

Conclusion

These riots have obscured the other massive story emanating from Minnesota, the missing $19 billion Medicaid funds due to alleged fraud. It has been alleged that the perpetrators were mostly Somalis, both citizens and illegals. It is obvious that Governor Walz, US Representative Ilhan Omar and other officials either aided and abetted these crimes or ignored them for political reasons.

This is related to another disturbing story regarding Omar, namely how she went from being virtually broke one year ago to being worth an estimated $30 million presently. The financial dealings of both her and her husband are shrouded in mystery. The House Oversight Committee is investigating and has subpoenaed her spouse to testify. In the words of the late Desi Arnaz, “they have some ‘splaining to do.”

These are very serious allegations with potentially far-reaching consequences. I have blogged about this matter in more detail previously. We may be on the cusp of uncovering a new level of fraud, deceit and greed with respect to elected officials.

Once again, the Dems find themselves on the wrong side of an 80-20 issue. They are violating federal law by defending illegal aliens who have committed crimes against law-abiding Americans, in some cases children, rather than assisting federal officials who are performing their legal duties to protect us. You notice that these Dem politicians never mention the names of those citizens who have been victimized, but they are quick to defend the illegals. Good luck with that issue in the 2026 elections.

I hope that Trump makes the right decision and cleans up the mess in Minneapolis expeditiously.

I HAVE A DREAM

Tomorrow, Monday, January 19, we will celebrate the birthday of, in my mind, the greatest civil rights leader in American history.  Of course, I am referring to Martin Luther King, Jr.  MLK Day is a national holiday, and as is the case with many of our holidays, we celebrate it on a Monday, in this instance the third one in January, rather than on the actual day of MLK’s birth (January 15). MLK Day has been recognized in all 50 states since the early 2000s, however, some states, such as Alabama and Mississippi, have combined it with “Robert E. Lee Day” to honor the birthday of the commanding general of the Confederacy who was born on January 19.

This year will mark the 58th anniversary of his untimely assassination on April 4, 1968.  Like the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the assassination of President JFK on November 22, 1963, and the terror attack on 9/11/2001 most of us will always remember where we were when we heard the horrible news.

For some people, the holiday holds no special meaning; it is just a day off from work, a day to spend with family or friends, part of a long three-day weekend.  For many of us, however, particularly those of us who were alive in the 1950s and 1960s, it is much, much more.

MLK was born on January 15, 1929.  MLK was more than just a pastor.  He believed that more advancement in civil rights could be achieved by civil disobedience and non-violence rather than by violence.  He preached peaceful disobedience such as sit-ins, marches and demonstrations, often in the face of wanton violence and cruelty by the police and others, rather than by rioting and violence.  In this regard, he was inspired by Mahatma Gandhi.  In turn, he inspired many others such as Nelson Mandela and the Black Civil Rights movement in South Africa.

He also recognized the power of the press to bring attention to his cause and influence public opinion. For example, as many as 70 million people around the world witnessed the police brutality inflicted on the peaceful black and white marchers in Selma, Alabama, in March of 1965, including women and children as well as men.  Those images, broadcast live on TV and radio, appalled and disgusted many people and provided an immeasurable boost to the public awareness of the injustices being visited upon blacks in the South. These events were captured dramatically and realistically in the 2014 movie, “Selma,” which featured David Oyelowo as MLK.  If you haven’t seen it, I recommend it.

Unlike any other African American leaders before or since, he had the ability to unite, rather than divide.  Although he was criticized by some of the more militant civil rights leaders of the time, such as Stokely Carmichael, he commanded the support and respect of a large majority of blacks and many whites as well. In that regard, he was similar to Mandela.

After his death, despite the urgings of some civil rights leaders who wanted to continue MLK’s philosophy, more militant African American leaders, such as Mr. Carmichael, came into prominence. There was rioting in over 100 US cities, and a slew of violent incidents at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago in front of the national press and millions of Americans, which many believe swung the 1968 presidential election to Richard Nixon. 

MLK came into prominence in 1955 when he led a bus boycott, peacefully, in Montgomery, Alabama.  The boycott had been fueled by the famous Rosa Parks incident in which she had refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white person.  She was arrested on December 1. (Most people don’t know that earlier that year in March a similar incident had occurred, also in Montgomery, involving Claudette Colvin, a black girl who had also refused to give up her seat to a white man.  However, that case did not receive the same notoriety.  Civil rights lawyers declined to pursue it because Colvin was 15, unmarried and pregnant. They chose to wait for a case with a more favorable fact pattern, and they were proven to be right.)

Later, MLK became the leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and remained so until his death. He applied his non-violence philosophy to protests in Selma, Ala., St. Augustine, FL, and the March on Washington, D. C., among others. He made it a policy never to endorse a particular political party or candidate. He believed he could be more effective if he were neutral and not beholden to anyone.  Furthermore, in his view, neither party was all bad, and neither one was perfect.  In his words, “[t]hey both have weaknesses.”

Perhaps, MLK’s signature moment occurred during the famous March on Washington in August 1963.  Ironically, MLK was not the primary organizer of the March.  That was Bayard Rustin, a colleague.  The primary purpose of the March was to dramatize the plight of blacks in the South.  Civil rights leaders, including Roy Wilkins, NAACP, Whitney Young, National Urban League, A. Philip Randolph, Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, John Lewis, SNCC, James Farmer CORE, and MLK, wanted to bring awareness of these issues right to the seat of the Federal government.  More than 250,000 people of all ethnicities and colors attended.  MLK was one of several speakers, and he only spoke for 17 minutes.  But, his “I Have a Dream” speech became one of the most famous speeches ever.  The March, in general, and MLK’s speech, in particular, are credited with bringing civil rights to the political forefront and facilitating the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Some little-known facts about MLK:

1. His birth name was Michael King, Jr., after his father.  In 1931 his father changed his own name to Martin Luther King, after the German theologian, Martin Luther, whom he admired.  At the same time, he changed his son’s name.

2. In 1958 MLK was stabbed in the chest after a speech by a woman who had been stalking him, and he nearly died.

3. The FBI began tapping MLK’s telephone as early as 1963.  Robert Kennedy, who was Attorney General at the time and who is viewed as a staunch supporter of civil rights, in general, and MLK, in particular, authorized the tapping.

4. MLK won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 at the age of 35, the youngest age ever at the time.

5. MLK won a Grammy Award in 1971, posthumously.  It should be noted that he won it, not because he displayed a great singing voice, but for a “Spoken Word Album,” “Why I Oppose the War in Vietnam.”  In addition, he won countless other awards and was awarded some 50 honorary degrees from various colleges and universities.

6. Even though MLK was one of the great public speakers of his time, inexplicably, he got a “C” in a public speaking course at the seminary.  (Kind of like a baseball scout saying Babe Ruth can hit “a little bit.”)

7. MLK is one of three individuals and the only native-born American to have a holiday named after him.  In case you’re wondering, the others are George Washington (born in the COLONY of Virginia), and Christopher Columbus.

Some MLK quotes to ponder:

1. “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
2. “The time is always right to do what is right.”
3. “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.”
4. “Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.  Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.”
5. “Free at last. Free at last. Thank God almighty, we are free at last.”
6. “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

In recent years there has been much division among African Americans as well as their leaders.  Some are moderate and want to work within the system; others are more militant.  In my view, many of these militants are no more than “race hustlers,” have their own agendas and look for any excuse to foment distrust and discord.  They do more harm than good. If you doubt me, just randomly turn on CNN or MSNBC and listen to some of the news coverage. The coverage and commentary of some of the guest commentators (and a few of the news anchors as well) are ignorant, subjective and divisive.

Most often, crimes are viewed through the lens of race rather than the facts, and the media will very often jump to conclusions without regard of the facts. Later, when the facts become known if, as is often the case they are change the narrative, they are ignored or downplayed. “White on black” crimes get extensive coverage while “black on black” crimes, which are far more numerous, are largely ignored.

I firmly believe that MLK would have been appalled by the violent, arbitrary and senseless rioting and sharp uptick in crime of the past several years that have been instigated, financed, aided, and abetted by BLM, ANTIFA, professional agitators, many Dem political leaders and much of the media. Certain people of color (we all know who are) love to play the “race card” to justify their actions. (In my opinion this is a sure sign that they have no real argument.) Moreover, I find this to be senseless and ironic since most of the victims are themselves poor minorities. How is that helping the civil rights movement?  That is not what MLK stood for.  Furthermore, in my view, he would not have been an exponent of the extreme “cancel culture,” “critical race theory,” DEI, and “political correctness” movements of recent years that many see as divisive.

One can speculate whether and to what extent MLK’s assassination changed the course of history.  In my opinion, had MLK lived, the Civil Rights Movement would have been considerably different over the last 50 years, more peaceful and less divisive, with better results.  Furthermore, his assassination had a significant impact, not only on the history of the civil rights movement, but also on the overall history of the country, itself.  I hope and believe that eventually a moderate leader will emerge and bridge the gap as MLK did half a century ago.

CONCLUSION

In my opinion, we have made much progress in the area of civil rights.  For example, we have elected an African American president (twice) and vice president; African Americans have been elected to Congress and been appointed to the Supreme Court; and African Americans hold and have held positions of prominence in every field of endeavor, including business, entertainment, sports, and the military.  But it is still a work in progress.  We can do more.

So, as you enjoy the holiday in whatever manner you choose, I ask you to reflect for a moment on where we are as a nation regarding civil rights, where we want to go and how we get there.

THIS MONTH IN HISTORY – JANUARY

According to Wikipedia, January 1, New Years Day, is the most celebrated holiday worldwide. Many historically-significant events have occurred on this date as well as on other dates during the month. Please see below.

1/1/1502 – Portuguese explorers, led by Pedro Alvarez Cabral, landed in present-day Brazil. They named the location Rio de Janeiro (River of January).

1/1/1660 – Samuel Pepys commenced his famous diary, which was to become a definitive chronicle of life in late 17th century London. Famous events described in it include The Great Plague of 1664-1665, which wiped out roughly one-fourth of London’s population, and the Great Fire of 1666, which destroyed much of the city.

1/1/1776 – George Washington unveiled the first national flag, aka the Grand Union Flag.

1/1/1863 – President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed the slaves in the Confederacy.

1/1/1892 – Ellis Island opened. Over 20 million immigrants were processed there between 1892 and 1954 when it closed.

1/1/1901 – The British Commonwealth of Australia was founded.

1/1/1959 – Fidel Castro seized control of Cuba.

1/1/1999 – The currency, the Euro, was born.

1/3/1924 – Howard Carter, British Egyptologist, discovered the burial site of Egyptian King Tut.

1/3/1959 – Alaska became the 49th state of the US.

1/7/1714 – British inventor, Henry Mill, received a patent for the typewriter.

1/8/1815 – The Battle of New Orleans, which many historians consider among the most significant in US history, commenced. The outnumbered and outgunned Americans, under the command of Andrew Jackson, defeated the British. Ironically, unbeknownst to the participants the treaty ending the War of 1812 had already been signed so the battle was unnecessary.

1/10/1863 – The first underground railroad, appropriately called “The Underground,” commenced operation in London.

1/10/1920 – The League of Nations was born. It was doomed to failure because the US never joined.

1/10/1946 – The first meeting of the United Nations took place in London.

1/11/1964 – The US Surgeon General issued the controversial report stating that smoking cigarettes may be hazardous to one’s health.

1/12/1932 – Hattie Caraway of Arkansas became the first female US Senator, filling the remainder of her late husband’s term.

1/15/1870 – The first use of a donkey to symbolize the Democratic Party appeared as a cartoon in Harpers Weekly.

1/19/1966 – Indira Gandhi became the first female Prime Minister of India. Later, she was assassinated by one of her own bodyguards.

1/19/1983 – Klaus Barbie, aka the “Butcher of Lyon,” was arrested in Bolivia. Eventually, he was extradited to France. He was tried and convicted of war crimes and died in prison.

1/21/1793 – Following the French Revolution King Louis XVI was guillotined.

1/22/1901 – England’s Queen Victoria died after a 64-year reign, the longest in British history at the time.

1/22/1973 – Abortion became legal in the US.

1/24/1965 – Winston Churchill, arguably England’s greatest prime minister ever, died.

1/24/1972 – A WWII Japanese soldier, who had been hiding on Guam not realizing the war was long since over, was discovered.

1/27/1945 – The Russian Army liberated Auschwitz.

1/27/1973 – Representatives of the US and North Vietnam signed a treaty ending the Vietnam War.

1/28/1935 – Iceland became the first country to legalize abortion.

1/28/1986 – The Space Shuttle Challenger exploded, killing all aboard, including Christa McAuliffe, a teacher, who has been slated to be the first “ordinary” citizen in space.

1/29/1919 – Prohibition was ratified. The unintended consequence of this ill-advised constitutional amendment was the substantial growth of organized crime, which was only too happy to provide illegal alcoholic beverages to a thirsty populace. The amendment was repealed on December 5, 1933.

1/31/1943 – The German Army surrendered at Stalingrad in what was generally considered to be the turning point in the European Theatre of WWII.

Birthdays: Paul Revere, 1/1/1735; Betsy Ross, 1/1/1752; Louis Braille, invented the reading system for blind people, 1/4/1809; Joan of Arc, 1/6/1412; Millard Fillmore, 13th President, 1/7/1800; Elvis Presley, 1/8/1935; Richard Nixon, 37th President, 1/9/1913; Alexander Hamilton, 1/11/1755; John Hancock, 1/12/1737; Benedict Arnold, 1/14/1741; Albert Schweitzer, 1/14/1875; Martin Luther King, 1/15/1929; Andre Michelin, pioneered the use of pneumatic tires on cars, 1/16/1853; Benjamin Franklyn, 1/17/1706; Muhammad Ali, 1/17/1942; Robert E. Lee, 1/19/1807; Edgar Allen Poe,1/19/1809; Ethan Allen, 1/21/1738; Douglas MacArthur, 1/26/1880; Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, 1/27/1756; William McKinley, 25th President, 1/29/1843; Franklyn Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President, 1/30/1882; Jackie Robinson, 1/31/1919.

ICE OFFICER KILLS PROTESTER IN MINNEAPOLIS

This blog is a compendium of various media accounts supplemented by my personal opinion, where indicated.

It was just a matter of time. It was bound to happen sooner or later. On one side there were DHS and ICE officials determined to seek and detain illegal migrants in accordance with federal law; on the other side, in close proximity, were pro-migrant protesters fueled by irresponsible and inaccurate rhetoric from left-wing politicians, civic leaders, and media outlets. It was like placing a lit match next to a stick of dynamite. In reality, I’m surprised it didn’t happen sooner.

In my view the incident was a tragedy. No one wants to see a person killed in that manner. I extend my heartfelt sympathies to Renee Nicole Good’s family and friends.

That said, I have to ask, what was she thinking? Like most of you I have viewed the footage of the incident multiple times from different vantage points. Good was in a maroon SUV that was clearly blocking the street impeding law enforcement vehicles. A crowd of protesters was gathered in the vicinity. ICE agents pulled up to said vehicle, exited their vehicle and appeared to tell the woman behind the wheel to exit her vehicle. At that point, most people would comply. The idea is to recognize you are in a tense situation, and rather than exacerbate it you should try to calm it down. She appeared to ignore the order.

One of the agents moved to open the driver’s door. Another agent was positioned near the front of the vehicle. Suddenly, Good backed up then caused the car to lurch forward toward the officer. She appeared to hit the officer as she drove off. Reflexively, the officer fired twice killing the woman. Subsequently, the SUV lost control and crashed into a nearby parked vehicle. Incidentally, back in June the officer had been seriously injured when he was attacked and dragged by another vehicle, so one can understand that he would be wary of a recurrence.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and other federal officials characterized the incident as a “domestic terrorist attack.” At a press conference later in the day she informed reporters that Good had been “stalking and impeding” immigration agents “throughout the day.” She added that the DHS has commenced an investigation.

One has to wonder what in the world was Ms. Good thinking. What would cause a seemingly normal wife and mother to brazenly stalk, impede and disobey federal officers in the legal performance of their duties? What did she think was going to happen? I’ll offer my opinion below.

Predictably, various Dem politicians and “experts” in the media have felt compelled to comment. Never mind that the incident is still under investigation. These bloviators have already tried and convicted the officer, DHS and, of course, President Trump. As they should know, in the US one is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. We don’t jump to conclusions based on incomplete or inaccurate information.

For example, Comrade Zoh characterized the incident as “murder.” To my knowledge Zoh does not possess a law degree and does not have the foggiest notion of the legal definition of “murder.” MN Governor Tim Walz (the “buffoon”) and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey issued expletive-laced tirades directed at DHS and Trump that ICE has no right to be in MN, and they don’t want them nor need them there. I beg to differ. The history and current empirical evidence say otherwise. Along those lines Fox News commentator Lawrence Jones opined, “what is Jacob Frey thinking? Does he want his city to burn again?” I believe the buffoon sees the incident as a welcome distraction from the massive fraud in MN currently under investigation.

In a post on Truth Social, President Trump commented that an ICE officer was “viciously” run over. “It is hard to believe he is alive, but [he] is now recovering.” To be fair, I think “viciously” was an exaggeration.

Conclusion

The real tragedy is that the entire incident was unnecessary and preventable. Let’s be clear. In my opinion the “root cause” of the problem was the Biden Administration’s open border policies that enabled untold millions of illegal migrants to gain access to the US. As one would expect a goodly portion of them settled in sanctuary jurisdictions like MN. Under federal law DHS has not only the authority, but also the responsibility to ferret out these persons, detain them, and have them expelled from the country. In all instances federal law supersedes state and local laws such as sanctuary to illegal migrants.

Anyone who impedes the federal officers in their performance of those duties is in contravention of federal law and should be prosecuted. That includes not those who interfered physically, but also those who continually spew out inciteful language. Such language is very damaging as it encourages certain easily influenced persons like Ms. Good to violence. These aiders and abettors should be prosecuted as well.