BIDEN-TRUMP PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. THE IMMEDIATE AFTERMATH

The 2024 Biden-Trump debate has been consigned to the annals of history. In many respects it was a real game changer. I think it will resonate among political historians for a long time (either famously or infamously depending on one’s political preference). In my lifetime I have watched many presidential debates, and I have never witnessed one so decisive. Frankly, at times, I was almost embarrassed for Biden.

Already certain significant patterns and trends have emerged. It is important to realize that the debate was only a few days ago, and generally speaking the full ramifications of it will not be apparent for a while. However, some immediate patterns have emerged, which I will list below as my considered opinion, with which, as always you are free to agree or disagree.

A plethora of polls and opinions have been published in the last few days. All of them have had negative implications for both Biden and the Dems. For instance:

  1. I could not find any publication or commentator that thought Biden won the debate or even performed well.
  2. Most polls’ results were consistent with the Democracy Corp poll of Dem-leaning voters many of whom described Biden as “confused,” “frail,” and exhibiting “dementia.”
  3. As I reported in my previous blog even media Dem stalwarts such as CNN, MSNBC and the NY Times were in a panic and were calling for Biden to step aside.
  4. John Levine, writing in the NY Post, put it succinctly opining that “Trump crushed Biden.” Although “crushed” may be a rather strong characterization virtually every poll concurs that Trump won, as do I. For example, a poll taken by Schoen Cooperman Research found that 51% felt Trump had won the debate compared to 34% for Biden.
  5. Even more foreboding, 50% of respondents in the same poll said that based on the debate they would be more likely to vote. Guess for whom those persons would be voting.
  6. Other polls reported similarly dire news for Biden. For example, a CBS poll disclosed that 46% of Dem registered voters and 72% of all registered voters felt Biden does not possess the “mental and cognitive health to serve as president” and should not be running. The top three reasons given were his age, decisions he might make as president, and his record as president.
  7. Ominously, the negativity increased among those who actually watched the debate.
  8. According to a Morning Consult poll 60% want Biden to withdraw and be replaced. I will evaluate possible replacements below.
  9. Some respondents replied that Biden’s poor performance was even worse than they expected. Probably, those were persons who got their news from one of the many media outlets that continuously hid or minimized Biden’s deficiencies. Most Fox viewers were not surprised.

Normally, I am not a proponent of fact-checking. All politicians bend the truth at times, particularly under the pressure of a debate. However, Biden told some outright lies that were too egregious to ignore.

For example:

  1. “I’m the only president this century that doesn’t have any – this decade – that doesn’t have any troops dying anywhere in the world.” He forgot about the 13 soldiers who died during the ill-advised, ill-planned, and ill-executed withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. We also left behind an untold number of native Afghanis who had worked for and with us who we had at least a moral obligation to take out plus billions of dollars of military weapons and equipment.
  2. “The US Border Patrol union endorsed me.” The union debunked that immediately and emphatically with a posting on X. “To be clear. We never have and never will endorse Biden.”

Dem party members, fund raisers, and supporters are in a quandary. Many of them are extremely distressed at the prospect of a Trump presidency. They hate him with a passion. Their hate is irrational. There is a term for their feelings. It’s called “Trump Derangement Syndrome or TDS. They truly believe he is evil. Some of them have referred to him as a Nazi. Some have even extended those characterizations to Trump supporters. I have never seen anything like it. Even Richard Nixon, as unpopular as he was by the opposition, did not engender such extreme feelings.

They put all their eggs in the Biden basket, and now they don’t know what to do. They are in a bind. Biden is insisting he will not drop out. Any alternative candidates were dissuaded or precluded from campaigning. As a result, there is no viable alternative to Biden. The one positive news for Biden was that another poll released by Data for Progress failed to identify any possible replacement that would do better than him. That’s good for Biden but bad for the Dem Party.

VP Harris’ poll numbers are worse than Biden’s. She has been exposed as ignorant, incompetent and lazy and has no accomplishments on her record as VP. Newsome is young and vibrant, but he would have to run on his dismal record as governor of California. His far-left policies have virtually bankrupted the state. Buttigieg would have to defend his spotty record as Mayor of South Bend and Transportation Secretary. Michelle Obama insists she is not interested. Hillary? Please!

CONCLUSION

Most everyone agrees that this election will be crucial for the country’s future. The country is in trouble. It is sharply divided almost down the middle politically, socially and economically. Many feel the media is sharply biased and the scales of justice are tilted. Furthermore, supporters of each candidate have exhibited an intense dislike for the other one. Feelings are so extreme that most people are loath to even engage in meaningful political dialogue lest they evolve into arguments or even fights. For most people the answer to the standard question “are you better off today than you were four years ago is a resounding “no.”

As I said, the situation is very fluid. Stay tuned for future developments.

BIDEN-TRUMP PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

In my view, analysis of the Biden-Trump Presidential debate boiled down to one issue. It was very simple Each candidate had one mission. It was not about policy. At this point, most of the electorate has made up its mind about which candidate’s policies they favor, and most of them are not likely to waiver from their convictions. Furthermore, any policy gaffe could and would be “spun” by the spin doctors as is normally the case. (“He didn’t really mean that. What he meant was this.”) Each candidate had one crucial goal. To put it succinctly Trump fulfilled his and Biden failed his. More on this later.

This debate was all about optics, demeanor and appearance. Trump’s mission was to be disciplined, calm, resolute, and to avoid any bombastic, snarky, and demeaning attacks for which he has been known. Just state the facts. He was on the right side of most of the issues; he was ahead in the polls in most of the swing states; and he had the momentum. To put it in sports terms, he didn’t need to win the debate; just not lose it. Let the other guy lose it. Biden’s mission was to demonstrate he is cognitively able to serve as president for four more years. Avoid the stumbling, bumbling, fumbling and mumbling for which he has been known. Simply put, appear to be presidential, confident and in control. Try to bait Trump.

Well, we all saw what happened. Trump checked all the boxes he had to. Biden failed to do so miserably and decisively. In the words of Politico he “face planted.” He exhibited many of the traits of a cognitively impaired person – a stiff, halting, shuffling walk, a “deer in the headlights” stare, slack-jawed look, halting delivery, wandering eyes, and worst of all unintelligible speech.

He had many embarrassing moments, but two stood out in my memory. (1) He outright lied by claiming that “the Border Patrolmen [Union] endorsed” him. While all candidates occasionally lie and twist facts this one was particularly egregious as it was easily and promptly debunked. The BP union tweeted right back declaring “to be clear, we never have and never will endorse Biden;” and (2) he stumbled through his point about healthcare even losing his train of thought entirely at one point for several seconds and ending it by saying “we finally beat Medicare.” This made no sense. (Trump’s response was simply “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.”

It appears that for most of the viewers Biden’s performance was a real shock. They had never seen him this bad and had no idea of his deterioration. His handlers and media allies have been shielding him most effectively. They have been limiting his public appearances and have managed to deflect and spin most of the negative coverage. However, those of us who regularly get their news from Fox were not surprised. We have been observing this decline for years. The mainstream media’s penchant for “fake news” has finally been exposed.

To illustrate the depth of Biden’s debacle. It’s worth noting the post-debate commentary on CNN. As we know, CNN has continually criticized Trump and defended Biden even to the point of distorting the news. None of the 15 or so commentators had anything positive to say about Biden’s performance. A couple of representative quotes: 1) John King described a “deep, wide and very aggressive panic in the Democratic Party.” 2) David Axelrod stated that “many Democrats felt shock[ed] at how President Biden looked at the beginning of the debate.” 3) Maria Shriver tweeted that there was “panic” in the Dem Party (as a result of the debate).

CONCLUSION

  1. For Biden and the Dems there is no coming back from this. It is said that “a picture is worth a thousand words.” We all saw the picture and it wasn’t pretty. Even worse, our allies and our enemies saw it too. The spin doctors can’t make us unsee it. As Chico Marx once said, “Who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?”
  2. The next debate is scheduled for September 10. That leaves 2 1/2 months to “live” with last night’s results, 2 1/2 months for those results to be cemented in the minds of voters. Moreover, my prediction is that the Dems will find some pretext to cancel it unless they manage to replace Biden.
  3. Today, most of the Dems are in a panic. So are their fundraisers, which be more significant. That is not hyperbole. That is not an exaggeration. Even the CNN and MSNBC commentators I listened to agreed Biden performance was disastrous. There is no way to spin or fact-check out of it.
  4. Most Dem supporters are probably already contemplating how, when and with whom to replace Biden. Down-ballot candidates for the Senate and the House saw their chances of winning take a big hit, and they are doubtlessly looking for ways to disassociate themselves from Biden. Whatever coattails he had have become an anchor. Only the most ardent Trump-hating, Kool-Aid-drinking supporters are remaining in his corner.
  5. Replacing Biden will not be easy. It is a complicated, though not impossible, process. Biden won 95% of the delegates in the primaries. They are pledged, though not legally committed, to him at least on the first ballot. They were hand-picked by the Biden campaign and are loyal to him. Historically, it has been rare for a delegate to abandon the candidate to whom he is pledged on the first ballot. For a majority to do so would be too farfetched to consider. The only way to replace him would be if declines the nomination at the convention and releases his delegates. So far, he has not shown any inclination to do so. Maybe members of his inner circle including his family, the Obamas and the Clintons could convince him, but as I write this none of them has shown any overt desire to convince him to withdraw.
  6. Invoking the 25th amendment before the convention is not a consideration. That is an unwieldy process and would elevate Kamala Harris, which no one wants.

Obviously, the situation is very fluid and is subject to change. This promises to be a very intriguing election. Stay tuned for further developments.

MY HERO

July 5 will mark the nine-year anniversary of the most horrific day in the lives of my wife and I, a day no parent should have to endure. Eventually, the ordeal had a happy ending, but it was touch and go for a while. Subsequently, I shared our experiences in a blog entitled “My Hero.”

As the aforementioned anniversary approaches I would like to re-publish the blog as I do every year at this time. (Some of you are new followers of my blogs and may not have seen it.) I believe it is as inspirational now as it was then. Perhaps, you could forward it to a friend or relative who has suffered a stroke, or other live-threatening health issue, and might benefit from reading it. So, read, enjoy and be inspired by “My Hero.”

“Who is your hero? Who has inspired you by exhibiting extreme courage and achievement in the face of adversity? Is it a historical figure, like George Washington or Abraham Lincoln, or a religious figure, like Moses, Jesus or Muhammed, or maybe, a civil rights icon, like Martin Luther King or Nelson Mandela? Or, perhaps, it might be an ordinary person you know or know of who, while not famous, has accomplished something so truly remarkable, against such long odds that you are truly inspired. Not all of us can point to such a person, but I can. It is someone very close to me that I have known all his life. It is my son, Matt.

It all began on July 5, 2015, a day I will never forget. Like the JFK assassination and the 9/11 terrorist attacks I will never forget where I was and what I was doing when I heard the awful news. It was a typical summer’s day in the NYC area, bright and sunny. Matt was enjoying a family day with some friends and his lovely wife and two young children at a local club. Suddenly, after swimming in the lake he became dizzy, lost vision in one eye and collapsed. He had suffered a dissection of his carotid artery, which had triggered a massive stroke.

Luckily, there was a doctor present. He immediately recognized what was happening and knew exactly what to do. This doctor accompanied Matt in the ambulance and stayed with him at the local hospital to ensure that the ER doctors gave him the clot-buster shot and other appropriate treatment, including emergency surgery to remove the clot within the five-six-hour window that is considered to be optimal for treating strokes. This certainly mitigated the effects of the stroke and may even have saved his life.

My wife and I were eating dinner with friends at a local restaurant when we got the shocking telephone call that Matt had suffered a stroke. It seemed impossible. Matt was only 40 and in excellent physical condition. He worked out regularly, ran, and practiced jujitsu. The caller did not know any details, not even if Matt were alive. If you’re a parent, you know that type of telephone call is as bad as it gets. Luckily, our friends insisted on driving us to the hospital in Westchester to which Matt was being transported (the Westchester Trauma Center). I don’t think I was in any condition to drive. We arrived at more or less the same time as Matt. We were able to see him and ascertain that although he was in very serious condition, he was alive. After the surgery he was only able to breathe with the aid of a ventilator, and his skin was the color of white porcelain.

Over the next few days the medical news was very dire. The doctors confirmed that Matt had, indeed, suffered a massive stroke. He was not conscious; he was paralyzed on his right side; he might need a craniotomy; he was blind in his left eye; and he had only partial vision in his right eye. He was in such bad shape that I felt elated a few days later when I squeezed his hand and felt him squeeze mine back.

The doctors told us he was facing a long, arduous recovery, one – two weeks at the hospital followed by six to nine months at a rehab facility. In addition, they said there was a good possibility that he would never recognize us, speak, or be able to walk unassisted. As far as returning to a normal life as a husband and father and resuming his career as a senior research analyst, that was seemingly too unrealistic to even contemplate. (Later, Matt told us that one of the doctors had flat-out told him he would not recover sufficiently to do so. When we asked him if that had bothered him, he said “no, I knew he was wrong.”). I realize that doctors feel compelled to disclose all possibilities, but there is a natural tendency to focus on the most negative ones, and that was an extremely disturbing prognosis.

Over the next year. Matt made a remarkable recovery. He was discharged from the hospital in only six days and transferred to the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital in White Plains, NY for rehab. Not only did he have to rehabilitate himself physically, but he also had to rehab his mind and his memory.

At first, he didn’t even recall very basic elements of his life, such as the names of his wife and children and his current address. He had to relearn how to speak. His rate of progress was beyond anyone’s most optimistic expectations. He attacked his rehab with a vengeance. He attended every session. He never once told them he was in too much pain, too tired, or not in the mood, as many rehab patients do. Many times he would cut short our visit by telling us he had to leave for a rehab session. If they told him to do ten of something, he would do 15. He would complete the most tedious and frustrating of tasks without complaint. His course of rehab included robotics, which helped considerably. Of course, it helped that he was only 40 years old and in excellent physical condition, but, nevertheless, he astounded the doctors, the therapists, and, indeed, even us with his progress.

In August 2016, after less than one month at Burke, he was discharged. For a while, he continued to undergo private rehab once a week. Now, he exercises by running.

CONCLUSION

Matt’s astounding recovery included the following accomplishments:

1. He completed his rehab at Burke and returned home to his family well ahead of schedule.
2. The day he was discharged he accompanied his wife and son to Nassau Coliseum, which was over a one-hour drive, to see Billy Joel’s last concert there.
3. He climbed up to the top of the Statue of Liberty.
4. He has resumed his career as a senior research analyst at a Wall Street firm. This is a remarkable achievement since his job is very demanding, requiring many hours of complex analysis, a high level of prolonged concentration, high-level meetings with clients, and travel.
5. He has completed the NYC marathon and various half marathons and works out regularly. How many non-stroke victims can say that?
6. Most importantly, has resumed his role as husband and father, and my wife and I have our son back.

During his recovery period Matt was fond of saying his full-time job was to get better. He applied the same single-minded determination and dedication to that task as he has to everything else in his life. He is not all the way back to where he was, but if you were to meet him today for the first time you would likely not realize that he had suffered a massive stroke only a few years ago.

My wife and I know that Matt was extremely lucky that there was a doctor present who ensured he received the immediate care he needed as well as benefiting from an amazing support system of friends, relatives and colleagues, and, for that, we will be eternally grateful. However, the determination with which he attacked his rehab virtually willing himself to get better was nothing short of amazing!

We have always been very proud of Matt, but, now, he is and will always be, our hero.”

Even now, nine years later, it is hard for me to read this blog without getting emotional. We know we dodged a major bullet. Matt has pretty much returned to normalcy, although he is still blind in one eye and has a weakness in his right hand. However, I remain optimistic that one day medical science will progress to the point that he will regain his sight. Who knows?

We have suggested to Matt that he could become an inspirational speaker to give others the benefit of his experience. Although he has made a couple of appearances with a friend who was also a stroke victim, for now, he has chosen to focus on his family and career.

Alternatively, his experience would make a fine inspirational movie, although Hollywood would probably dismiss it as too unrealistic. Indeed, as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction”

SAY HEY!

He was, quite simply, the best baseball player I ever saw, better than Mantle, DiMaggio, Aaron, Musial, Griffey, and Williams. They were all terrific players, Hall of Famers who dominated the sport, but Mays was better. He was the original “five-tool” player. He could hit, hit with power, run, field and throw. I would add a sixth tool for his uncanny ability to hit in the “clutch.” As a Dodgers fan, he was the last player I wanted to see at the plate with the game on the line. More on this later.

Willie Howard Mays, AKA “The Say Hey Kid,” was born on May 6, 1931 in Westfield, Alabama. Westfield was a poor, predominately black, company town dominated by the local ironworks plant. Both of Willie’s parents were superb athletes. His father, Cat Mays, was a star baseball player for the plant’s baseball team. His mother had been a star on the local high school basketball and track teams. Willie’s childhood nickname was “Buck.”

Willie’s parents never married, and they separated when Willie was three. Thereafter, Willie was raised by Cat and two of his aunts. Growing up, his favorite ballplayers were Ted Williams, Stan Musial, and Joe DiMaggio, no surprise as they were three of the best ballplayers at that time.

As you can surmise Willie was an outstanding all-around athlete in high school. In addition to baseball Willie starred on the basketball team, and he was the quarterback, fullback and punter on the football team. In addition, while still in high school he played minor league baseball for the Chattanooga Choo-Choos.

Mays did not graduate from high school until 1950 when he was 19. Various major league teams were vying for his services. In 1951 he signed with the NY Giants who beat out the Brooklyn Dodgers and the Boston Braves. His signing bonus was the grand sum of $4,000. I would say the Giants got themselves a bargain. By the way, can you imagine Mays on the Dodgers with Duke Snider, Jackie Robinson, Pee Wee Reese, Roy Campanella, Gil Hodges and the rest of the Boys of Summer? Wow!

Mays blew through the Giants minor league system and joined the Giants on May 24, 1951. It was then that he became known as the “Say Hey Kid.” Supposedly, the famous moniker was given to him by famed NY sportswriter Barney Kremenko based on his habit of greeting teammates with that phrase (e. g. “say, hey, how [are] you doing?”)

Mays’ debut was far from sterling, at least offensively. He went hitless in his first 12 at bats. His confidence was so shaken that he was convinced he didn’t belong in the ML. He tearfully begged Leo Durocher, his manager, to send him down. Durocher told him to relax and stop trying to “pull” everything. He added that Willie was the best centerfielder he had ever seen, and he would play the position as long as Leo was managing the team. After that pep talk Willie took off. He batted .290 the rest of the season with 20 homeruns and 68 RBIs and won the Rookie of the Year Award. Furthermore, the Giants won 40 of their last 58 games to catch the Dodgers who had had a seemingly insurmountable 13 1/2 game lead and beat the Dodgers in a three-game playoff to win the pennant on Bobby Thomson’s famous “shot heard ’round the world.”

Willie was now a big star, but Uncle Sam didn’t care. Like many other ballplayers Willie was drafted and spent the better part of two years in the army. Luckily, he did not see combat. He spent his time playing baseball on military teams. It was during this time that he adopted the famous basket catch that became his signature way of catching flyballs.

Willie was discharged in 1954, and he returned with a vengeance. He made the first of his 24 all-star teams, won the batting title with a .345 average, hit 41 homers, won the MVP award and led the Giants to the world championship. Oh, and by the way in game 1 of the WS he made “the catch.” I’m sure you’ve all seen it. Cleveland had runners on first and second in the eighth inning of a 2-2 tie. The Indians’ batter, Vic Wertz, belted one deep toward the centerfield wall, which was 483 feet away. It looked like a sure extra base hit that would score two runs. Even if the ball were caught it was very likely that the runner on second base would tag up and score. Willie sprinted all-out with his back to home plate like a wide receiver going for a touchdown. He made the catch, and in one motion whirled and threw a bullet to the infield. Not only did he rob Wertz, but also, he prevented the runner on second base from scoring. Eventually, the Giants won the game, which provided the impetus for a four-game sweep. It is generally regarded as his greatest catch, but Willie often said he made many other catches like that. He stated “I don’t compare ’em. I just catch ’em.” He was more impressed with the subsequent throw.

In his spare time, Mays would often play stickball with kids in Harlem. Can you imagine what a thrill that was for those kids?

Early in his career Willie participated in post-season barnstorming tours in which MLB players would travel throughout the country and internationally to play exhibition games. This was a real treat to fans in cities without teams as it was their only chance to see MLB players. Unfortunately, with the advent of television this practice died out in the mid-1950s.

The late 1940’s and 1950s was the golden age of NY baseball. During that time, it seemed the NY teams were in the WS every year. The Yankees were in it nine out of ten years and won five championships in a row. The Boys of Summer Dodgers were in it six out of ten years and won it in 1955; and the Giants were in it twice and won once. This gave rise to the term “subway series.” During this period each team was lucky to have a future HOFer patrolling centerfield – the Yankees’ Mickey Mantle, the Dodgers’ Duke Snider, and Mays. Fans would argue incessantly over who was the best. This rivalry gave rise to a popular song in 1981 by Terry Cashman, “Talkin Baseball.”

In 1958 the team moved to San Francisco. Willie became the highest paid player in the sport with a salary of $75,000. In 1963 he was bumped up to $105,000. That was a lot back in the pre-free agency days. Can you imagine what stars like him would command today?! The new stadium, Candlestick Park, was often windy and cold and not conducive to hitting homeruns. Nevertheless, Willie ended his career with 660 homeruns, which was the third highest at the time behind Henry Aaron and Babe Ruth.

At first, the SF fans did not warm up to Willie. They preferred homegrown stars such as Orlando Cepeda and Willie McCovey. Various theories were put forth for this. (1) In their minds he did not measure up to hometown hero, Joe DiMaggio. (2) Good as he was, he did not meet their unrealistic expectations as a fantastic player. (3) Willie had a reserved personality and tended to keep to himself. My guess is it was a combination of the three, but eventually Willie won them over.

Earlier, I mentioned Willie’s exceptional athleticism and versatility. He was one of the few members of the so-called “30-30 club” (homers and stolen bases). Remember, he played in an era when stolen bases were not popular or else he would likely have joined the “40-40 club.” Also, he became only the fourth player in the “20-20-20 club” (doubles, triples and homers). Quiz question #1: How many of the others can you name. If you can name all three you are truly a baseball savant. Hint: it’s not who you would think.

Later in his career Willie played some at first base, and at least one game at shortstop. It was the second game of the Memorial Day doubleheader in 1964. Yes, teams did play doubleheaders back then. Anyway, the second game went 23 innings and the Giants had run out of infielders. So, Mays played shortstop. (I was there. I saw it.)

In 1972 Mays was traded to the NY Mets. He was near the end and a mere shadow of his former self. He could no longer play an effective centerfield. It was almost embarrassing to watch him out there. Like most athletes he stayed in the game longer than he should have. But he did help the Mets win the 1973 pennant.

CONCLUSION

As I said, in my opinion Mays was the best ballplayer I ever saw. He played in a very competitive era – the 1950’s, 1960’s and 1970s. For most of his career there were only 16 teams, so each one had numerous star players, many of which were Hall of Famers. Yet he was the best.

It is difficult to name all of Willie’s accolades and accomplishments, but I will list some of them.

  1. He won two MVP awards and finished in the top five nine other times.
  2. He played in 24 All-Star games the second most behind Aaron’s 25. He holds All-Star game records for most at bats (75), hits (23), runs (20), and stolen bases (six). Also, he is tied for the lead in triples. He was so outstanding in those games and holds so many All-Star game records that Ted Williams once observed, “they invented the All-Star game for Willie Mays.”
  3. Mays’ WAR of 156.2 ranks fifth all-time, third among position players behind only Barry Bonds’s 162.8, whose numbers are suspect due to steroids, and Babe Ruth’s 162.1.
  4. In 1999 The Sporting News, the longtime bible of baseball, published its list of the 100 greatest players. Willie placed second to Babe Ruth. That same year baseball fans voted him to the “All Century Team.”
  5. Many believe that Mays was the best defensive outfielder ever (and not just because of his famous catch in the 1954 WS). As evidence of his defensive prowess, he is the career leader in putouts with 7,095. His defensive skills were almost legendary, so much so that if a centerfielder failed to catch a ball people would say “Mays would have had it.”
  6. He won 12 consecutive “gold gloves,” which is given to the best fielder at his position. He probably would have had more, but the award did not exist before 1957. Moreover, he led NL centerfielders in double plays five times and assists three times.
  7. In 1962 he became the first African American to be named team captain.
  8. In 2017 MLB renamed the WS MVP award the “Willie Mays World Series MVP Award.”
  9. Mays was inducted into the HOF in 1979, which was his first year of eligibility with 94.7% of the vote, the fourth highest at the time. Quiz question #2: Can you name the three players ahead of him
  10. Mays retired with 660 homeruns, the third highest at the time. That was astounding when you consider he played his home games in two ballparks that were not homer-friendly, and he spent two of his prime years in the military. If not, one can only speculate how many more he would have hit.
  11. Mays received honorary degrees from several colleges, among them were Yale and Dartmouth.
  12. His number was retired by both the Giants and the Mets, only the 15th player to have his number retired by multiple teams.

Upon his death Willie received many testimonials, too many to name all of them. Perhaps, the best one is from his longtime manager, Leo Durocher. Leo had a long career as both a player and a manager. He had played on the same team as Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig and many others on those renowned Yankees teams. Also, he managed many great players, including the Dodgers Boys of Summer teams. He called Mays not just the best centerfielder he had ever seen, but “the best ballplayer I have ever seen.” I would agree except for Ruth and perhaps Ohtani if his career continues along its current arc, but he’s certainly in the conversation. Durocher also pointed out that Mays “could beat you in more ways than any [other] ballplayer who ever lived.” I agree. I saw him win games with a homer, a clutch hit, a great catch, a great throw, a stolen base, whatever.

Willie Mays passed away on June 18, 2024, of heart failure at the age of 93, two days before MLB paid tribute to Willie and Negro league baseball by playing a game at historic Rickman Field in Birmingham, Ala the same field on which he had played as a teenager. He is survived by a son from his first marriage. He was the godfather of Barry Bonds. His second wife, Mae, had died in 2013.

Rest in peace Willie. You gave us baseball fans a lot of pleasure (and pain), and you will be sorely missed.

Quiz answers: (1) Two of the three are familiar names – Jimmy Rollins and Curtis Granderson. The other is Frank (“Wildfire” Schulte who did it in 1911. (2) Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth and Honus Wagner.

FATHER’S DAY

Today, June 16, the third Sunday of June, most of us will celebrate Father’s Day.   According to the British Broadcasting Corporation FD is celebrated in some 70 countries around the world.

In the US, FD is commonly viewed as an opportunity to gather with family and friends for barbecues, picnics, sporting activities (e.g. baseball, golf or fishing), eat at a favorite restaurant, or attend a Broadway show.  Generally, it is a fun day.  In view of all the negativity we have suffered through this year such a day will be most welcome.

The idea of an annual day to recognize fathers was first proposed by Sonora Dodd a resident of Spokane, WA, in 1909. She wanted to honor her own father who had raised her and five siblings as a single parent.  In her opinion, mothers had their “day,” so why shouldn’t fathers.  At first, she approached her pastor about organizing a special service on her father’s birthday, June 5, but for some reason, perhaps, time constraints, the celebration was deferred to the third Sunday of June.  The initial celebration was held in 1910.

For many years the idea of a “day” for fathers did not catch on with the general public. The major reason was the fear that it would become overly commercialized like, for example, Mother’s Day and Christmas.   In addition, the media was not behind the concept.  Rather than support the idea, they attacked it with sarcastic and cynical articles and cartoons.

FD did, however, have its supporters.  Congress debated a bill as early as 1913, but it did not pass.  Presidents such as Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge supported it publicly.

Some years later, Margaret Chase Smith, a longtime influential senator from Maine, criticized the inequity of Congress’ ignoring fathers while honoring mothers.  Finally, in 1966 LBJ issued a Presidential proclamation designating the third Sunday in June as FD.  It became a permanent holiday in 1972 during the Nixon Administration.

The timing and characteristics of FD celebrations in various countries differ depending on the seasons and various traditions and cultures, as follows:

  1. United Kingdom – It is also celebrated on the third Sunday of June.  It is recognized as a day to honor not only fathers, but also other father figures, such as grandfathers and fathers-in-law.  As in the US, typically, people pay a visit and give cards and gifts.  Other activities might include male-only outings [golf, football (soccer), or cricket], or trips.  One significant difference is that the day is not considered to be a holiday, just a normal Sunday.
  2. Canada – Very similar to the UK.  Popular activities would include going to the park, the zoo, or eating out in a restaurant.
  3.  Russia – The holiday, celebrated on February 23, is called Defender of the Fatherland Day.  All men are honored, not just fathers.  It began as a military celebration and is still marked by military parades.
  4. Mexico – Celebrated on the third Sunday of June.  It is marked with parties and gifts for dads and a 21 kilometer Father’s Day race.
  5. Brazil – It is celebrated on August 2 in honor of St. Joachim, patron saint of fathers and grandfathers.
  6. Bulgaria celebrates the day in December.
  7. According to The Sun various countries in the Southern Hemisphere, such as Australia and New Zealand, celebrate the holiday in September.
  8. Northern European countries, such as Norway, Sweden and Finland, celebrate the day in November.

CONCLUSION

The National Retail Federation estimates that Americans will spend a total of $22.4 billion on FD gifts in 2024, roughly $190 per person. These are significant amounts, but they pale beside the $35 billion total and $254 per person spent on Mother’s Day. Why do we spend so much more money on our mothers than on our fathers?  There are many theories, but no one knows for sure.

Generally, we don’t take our dads to restaurants to the same extent as we do our moms. Instead, often we put them work barbecuing. The National Restaurant Association reports that FD business ranks significantly below MD and Valentine’s Day, which are numbers one and two. Not surprising.

What are the most popular FD gifts?  According to the NRF #1 is a greeting card.   Other popular gifts include clothes, a special family outing, for example, taking a trip or attending a sporting event. tools, appliances and “personal care” items.

Dads, remember it is your day.  Spend it however you like (as long as your wife approves). And don’t forget the secret to a long and happy marriage. YES, DEAR!

THIS MONTH IN HISTORY – JUNE

Below please find a list of the significant historical events that have occurred during the month of June.

6/2/1937 – The Duke of Windsor, who, as Edward VII, had abdicated the throne of England, married Wallis Warfield Simpson, a commoner and a divorcee.
6/3/1972 – Sally Jan Priesand became the first female ordained rabbi in the US.
6/3/1989 – The Ayatollah Khomeini, notorious leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, died.
6/4/1989 – Chinese government troops fired on unarmed demonstrators in Tiananmen Square in Beijing. Upwards of 3,000 were killed; an additional 1,600 were imprisoned; and 27 were later executed.
6/5/1968 – Following a campaign speech Robert Kennedy was assassinated at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.
6/6/1944 – D-Day, one of the most significant battles in WWII. (Please see my previous blog for details.)
6/8/1874 – Cochise, one of the most notorious of Apache Indian leaders, died while living on the Chiricahua Reservation in AZ.
6/9/1898 – Great Britain signed a 99-year lease for Hong Kong. Control of the colony reverted to China at midnight, June 30, 1997.
6/12/1898 – The Philippine Islands declared their independence from Spain leading to the US’s invasion and occupation.
6/12/1963 – Civil rights leader Medgar Evers was assassinated in Jackson, MS, sparking widespread outrage and providing the impetus for comprehensive civil rights laws.
6/13/1966 – In “Miranda v. AZ,” the Supreme Court ruled that the police are required to apprise a suspect of his right to remain silent prior to being questioned.
6/14/1777 – John Adams introduced a resolution to establish an official flag for the 13 colonies. We celebrate this date as “Flag Day.”
6/15/1215 – England’s King John agreed to a charter, known as the Magna Carta, which granted certain rights and liberties to English nobles, and which has served as the basis for all democracies since.
6/17/1972 – Five GOP operatives were caught breaking into the DNC offices in the Watergate Hotel. Eventually, this precipitated a chain of events, which culminated in the resignation of President Nixon.
6/18/1812 – Congress declared war on Great Britain, commencing the War of 1812.
6/18/1815 – England and its allies defeated France decisively in the Battle of Waterloo, which effectively ended Napoleon’s reign as Emperor of France and precipitated his exile.
6/18/1983 – Dr. Sally Ride became the first American woman in space.
6/19/1953 – Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for the crime of selling information about the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union. They were not only the first married couple to be executed together in the US, but also the first US citizens to be executed for espionage.

6/19/2021 – “June Teenth” is designated as a federal holiday
6/24/1948 – The Soviet Union commenced its blockade of West Berlin. Eventually, the US and its allies broke the blockade with a massive airlift.
6/25/1876 – General George Custer and all soldiers under his command were slaughtered at the Little Bighorn by thousands of Sioux in what became known as “Custer’s Last Stand.”
6/25/1950 – North Korea attacked South Korea beginning the Korean Conflict, which lasted three years.
6/26/1945 – The UN Charter was signed by 50 nations in San Francisco.
6/28/1914 – Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the Crown Price of Austria and his wife, were assassinated in Sarajevo, by a Serbian nationalist, Gavrilo Princip, which set off a chain of events that culminated in WWI.
6/28/1919 – The Treaty of Versailles was signed, which marked the official end of WWI.
6/30/1971 – The 26th Amendment to the Constitution was enacted, which extended the right to vote to all US citizens age 18 and older.

Birthdays – Brigham Young, patriarch of the Mormon church and founder of the state of Utah, 6/1/1801 in Whittingham, VT; Norma Jean Mortensen, aka Marilyn Monroe, 6/1/1926 in Los Angeles; Marquis de Sade, his name is the origin of the word, sadism, due to his penchant for extreme cruelty and violence, 6/2/1740 in Paris; Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederacy, 6/3/1808 in Todd County, KY; King George III, ruler of England during the Revolutionary War, 6/4/1738; Adam Smith, renowned philosopher and economist, 6/5/1723 in Scotland; John Maynard Keynes, renowned British economist, 6/5/1883 in Cambridge, England; Nathan Hale, Revolutionary War patriot hung by Brits as a spy (“I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.”), 6/6/1755 in Coventry, CT; Frank Lloyd Wright, renowned architect, 6/8/1867 in Richland Center, WI; Cole Porter, renowned lyricist and composer (“Kiss Me Kate,” “Can Can”), 6/9/1893 in Peru, IN; Hattie McDaniel, actress (‘Mammy’ in “Gone with the Wind”), 6/10/1889 in Wichita, KS; Frances Gumm, aka Judy Garland, renowned singer and actress (“Wizard of Oz”), 6/10/1922 in Grand Rapids, MN; Jeanette Rankin, first woman to be elected to Congress, 6/11/1880 in Missoula MT; Jacques Cousteau, undersea explorer, 6/11/1910 in France; Vince Lombardi, renowned football coach 6/11/1913 in Brooklyn, NY; George H. W. Bush, 41st president, 6/12/1924, in Milton, MA; Anne Frank, Holocaust victim, 6/12/1929 in Frankfurt, Germany; Harriet Beecher Stowe, author (“Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” origin of phrases “Uncle Tom” and “Simon Legree”),6/14/1811 in Litchfield, CT; Alois Alzheimer, psychologist and pathologist who discovered the degenerative disease named for him, 6/14/1864 in Germany; Stan Laurel, half of renowned comedy team, Laurel and Hardy, 6/16/1890 in England; Lou Gehrig, Hall of Fame baseball player, died from ALS, which is commonly called “Lou Gehrig’s disease,” 6/19/1903 in NYC; Audie Murphy, Medal of Honor WWII American war hero, 6/20/1924 in Kingston, TX; Jack Dempsey, heavyweight boxing champion, aka the “Manassa Mauler,” 6/24/1895 in Manassa, CO; Eric Arthur Blair, aka George Orwell, British satirist and author (“1984”) 6/25/1903 in India; Mildred “Babe” Didrikson, renowned female athlete, in Port Arthur TX; Mildred Hill, composed song that is sung most frequently; do you know the name? See below.), 6/27/1859 in Louisville, KY; William Mayo, surgeon (Mayo Clinic), 6/29/1861 in Le Sueur, MN.

Quiz answer – “Happy Birthday”

CAITLIN CLARK

Why do many of the WNBA players have a problem with Caitlin Clark? Why do they seem to resent her? They should be welcoming her with open arms. They should realize that she will grow the league’s popularity. Based upon her popularity it is very likely she will put more fannies in the seats and increase tv ratings. She will attract more sponsors. She will likely be a boon to the league. All of that spells more money – that’s M O N E Y – not only for her, but for everyone, players, coaches and owners alike.

Fans that heretofore had not paid the least bit of attention to the WNBA are now becoming fans because of Clark. For example, every fan knows who Caitlin Clark is, but I maintain that only the most ardent fans can name as many as ten other players in the league. Who was the league MVP last year? What team won the title? See answers below. If you know, tell me, and I will be shocked and impressed. As has often been said, “a rising tide lifts all boats.” So, I repeat, what is their problem with her. Read on for my opinion on the matter.

Caitlin was born on January 22, 2002 in Des Moines, IA. She commenced playing basketball at the age five. She excelled from the very beginning. At first, due the dearth of girls’ recreational leagues she played against boys. By age 13 she had begun to play against other girls, but due to her outstanding ability she competed against older girls. As a sixth grader she joined a local AAU team for whom she competed until she graduated high school. She played four years of varsity high school ball for Dowling Catholic High School in West Des Moines where she earned various accolades including All-State, All-Iowa and McDonalds All-American. In her senior year ESPN ranked her as the fourth best player in her class in the country.

She was a superb all-around athlete, excelling in softball, tennis and volleyball before concentrating on basketball. Two of her childhood idols were Harrison Barnes, also from Iowa and an NBA star with the Sacramento Kings and Maya Moore, a star with the Minnesota Lynx of the WNBA.

Based upon that outstanding resume of achievement Caitlin could have attended any college she wanted. Yet, she chose Iowa University, which was not known as a college basketball power. Why? Her reason tells you a lot about her character. “It’s a program that has never won the national championship. I didn’t want to do something that everyone else was doing.” Indeed, she did raise the profile of Iowa’s program substantially, leading the school to the national championship game in her junior year.

Caitlin is generally regarded as one of the best women’s college basketball players ever. ESPN analyst Rebecca Lobo, herself a former collegiate and professional star, characterized her as “the best offensive women’s college player since Diana Taurasi,” high praise if you’re familiar with the sport. She is one of if not the best long-range shooters ever. Her range is literally unlimited. Frequently, she would hit shots from the logo. The proficiency of her range is often compared to that of Stephen Curry, who is generally considered to be one of if not the best NBA shooters ever. According to USA Today Caitlin, like Curry, has “redefined what a good shot is in basketball.” Furthermore, she is an outstanding passer and leader. She does what a superstar is supposed to do, namely make her teammates better. Writing in the Wall Street Journal Jason Gay opined that Caitlin has [changed] the dimensionality of the game.”

Some of her college basketball achievements included:

  1. She is the all-time leading Division 1 scorer, men included.
  2. She was a four-time All-American.
  3. She was national player of the year twice.
  4. She was the first player to lead the country in both scoring and assists in the same year.
  5. She led a previously nondescript program to the title game.
  6. But her greatest achievement was to increase the popularity of the sport dramatically. Her games set attendance and tv viewership records. She attracted many new fans who had never deigned to pay attention to the sport. This phenomenon has been termed “the Caitlin Clark effect.”
  7. Last year as expected she was the first overall pick of the draft by the Indiana Fever.

She may not be the best player in the WNBA, at least not yet (after all, she is only a rookie), but she is arguably the most recognizable and most popular among the media and the fans. And therein lies the problem. In my opinion she is resented by many if not most of the WNBA players. They don’t think she deserves all the attention and praise she has been getting from the fans and the media. The league is predominantly African American, and some of the resentment can be attributed to the fact Clark is white. Unfortunately, most things in the country can be viewed through the prism of race.

This attitude toward Clark is not unique. For example, when Larry Bird entered the NBA in 1980 the league’s popularity was at a low point. Attendance and tv ratings were low. In fact, the NBA finals were not even shown live on tv. Bird had been a very popular player at Indiana State. In fact, his collegiate career had paralleled Caitlin’s to a large extent. He too had led a school with a historically pedestrian record to the NCAA Championship game and lost. His arrival was also much ballyhooed. He also was white in a predominantly black league. He too was resented by some players who thought he was overrated because he was white. But, in time, he and Magic Johnson brought the league to a higher level. Many observers credit him along with Magic and later Michael Jordan for making the league what it is today.

Another example would be Tiger Woods. He too arrived with much fanfare. He was a black man in a sport that was predominantly white. He too was resented by many players. However, in time his success and popularity brought golf to unforeseen levels. All golfers now earn money beyond their wildest dreams predominantly because of him. In the words of sportswriter Mark Cannizzaro Woods “paved the way for private jet travel to tournaments instead of seat 23D on Southwest Airlines.”

Clark has the chance to do the same for her sport as Bird, Magic, Jordan, and Woods have done for theirs. As I said, no one is saying she is the best player, although someday she might be. After all, she is only a rookie. She needs to work on her defense, build up her body and gain experience. But that doesn’t diminish what she can bring to the game right now.

In my view, Chennedy Carter’s roller derby-style hip check the other day was dirty, excessive, uncalled for and detrimental to the sport. It was not a basketball play. In fact, the ball was not even in play. Whereas I realize that all rookies in every sport are subjected to rough physical play as a form of initiation it appears that Clark is being targeted excessively. This view is shared by many observers including renowned UConn basketball coach Geno Auriemma. Former WNBA player and coach Nancy Lieberman reacted more forcefully. She said she would have “punched [Carter] in the face and told her to f**k off.” She also criticized Clark’s teammates for not coming to her defense. “Indiana has to be better. Somebody has to come to this kid’s [defense].” On the other hand, WNBA’s Breanna Stewart spoke for many current and former players whose view was that it was “physical play” and all players have to adjust to it.

CONCLUSION

I think the referee should have assessed a Flagrant 2 foul and ejected Carter. In addition, the league should consider a fine and/or a suspension to send a message that such behavior will not be tolerated prospectively. I was also taken aback by the non-reaction of Clark’s teammates. In every other sport that cheap shot would have provoked a fight or at least a confrontation. None of them reacted. At least in the NBA and NHL stars have a protector to dissuade such thuggery. If the league won’t protect Clark, the other Fever players have to. Clark could have been seriously injured and no one wants to see that.

Quiz answers: 1) 2023 MVP – Breanna Stewart. 2) 2023 league champion – Las Vegas Aces.

D-DAY

D-Day.  That’s all one has to say.  Most everyone knows what it was and what it meant. Just the very name conjures up remembrances and images of one of the bloodiest battles and one of the turning points of WWII.  The battle has been memorialized in books and movies, and who can forget the poignant image of countless crosses and Stars of David neatly lined up in military cemeteries in Normandy.

Thursday, June 6 will mark the 80th anniversary of this epic battle.  The Allied Forces included some 156,000 troops from various countries, including the US, UK, Free France, Canada and Norway, among others, 5,000 ships and landing craft, 11,000 planes, 50,000 land vehicles, and coordinated landings over a 50 mile stretch of beaches code-named Juno, Omaha, Utah, Sword and Gold, truly a massive undertaking.  Allied and German casualties have been estimated as high as 20,000 killed, wounded, missing and captured. If you were involved in the actual landing, whether you lived or died was largely a matter of luck and happenstance – two men would be sitting side-by-side in an LST and a German bullet would kill one and not the other.  Think about that for a minute.

In addition to the German guns the soldiers had to deal with the rough surf.  Wearing their battle gear made them heavy and unwieldy, and many of them actually drowned before reaching the beach.  The movie Saving Private Ryan depicts this grisly scene quite clearly and gruesomely.

If you were lucky enough to survive the landing, you became a “sitting duck” on the beach.  Then, if you managed to fight your way off the beach you had to charge into several thousand heavily armed German troops, which were placed strategically in fortified bunkers.  Once you fought your way past those, you were ready to commence the real battle to liberate France.  Keep in mind, many of these soldiers were just kids as young as 17 and, no doubt, scared s***less. Many of them knew they would likely die. I can’t imagine their bravery under those circumstances.

Planning for the operation began as early as 1943.  Russia, one of our allies at the time (“The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”), had been lobbying strongly for a second front to alleviate some of the pressure from the Russian Front.  Military leaders on both sides recognized the significance of a second front and expected the Allies to attempt to open one at some point.  The question was where and when.  The Allies were not prepared to attempt such a massive landing until early 1944, primarily because they needed time to build up levels of men and material.  Remember, the Allies were fighting in the Mediterranean and North Africa as well.  Plus, the US was involved in the Pacific War against the Japanese.  Finally, the British’s fighting capacity had been severely damaged in the debacle at Dunkirk in 1940.  Only a remarkable evacuation, aided by thousands of civilian small boats, prevented the Germans from capturing or destroying Britain’s entire army on the beach.

The operation was code-named Operation Overlord.  The landing, itself, was code-named Operation Neptune.  General Eisenhower was in charge.  Indeed, he was in charge of the entire Atlantic Theatre.  As the story goes, when he was put in charge his orders were very simple – “Win the War.”  No confusion; no ambiguity; no dubiety; no limited rules of engagement, which hampered us in Viet Nam and other future conflicts.  “Just win, baby.”

The Allies considered four possible landing sites: Brittany, Cotentin Peninsula, Pas de Calais and Normandy.  The first two were eliminated primarily because they were located on peninsulas, which would have afforded very narrow fronts that would have enabled the Germans to trap the soldiers in a counterattack.  That left Normandy and Calais.  Once the Allies decided on Normandy there were many attempts to deceive the Germans into thinking the landings would be at Calais.  Historical evidence indicates that the Germans thought Calais the most likely site anyway, possibly because it was closer to England, but both sites were heavily fortified.  Indeed, the Germans had planned to fortify the entire coast from Norway to Spain, a so-called “Atlantic Wall.”  This would have included concrete emplacements, barbed wire, booby traps, mines, the removal of ground cover, and, of course, troops and armored equipment.  Luckily for us, those fortifications were never completed.  Interestingly, although most of the German High Command viewed Calais as the most likely landing site, General Rommel, perhaps the best general on either side, surmised correctly that it would likely be at Normandy.

Accordingly, he increased fortifications in the area, but, luckily for us he was out of favor for political reasons, so some key elements of his plans for defending the area were ignored or overruled.  Most notably, some panzer divisions, which he had wanted to place in the Normandy area were, instead, retained in and around Paris.

In addition, the German Army was stretched very thinly.  Much of its manpower was committed to the Eastern Front and had been depleted by heavy casualties after five years of intense fighting.  Also, it had to deal with sabotage perpetrated by guerillas in various conquered countries. Finally, it was relying, for the most part, on captured equipment, which was not of high quality.

One of the biggest unknowns, and one that the Allies could not control, was the weather. Due to the complexity of the operation conditions had to be just so, including the tides, phases of the moon and the time of day.  Only a few days of a given month satisfied all criteria.  For example, a full moon was preferred to provide maximum illumination for the pilots.  Remember, instrumentation then was primitive compared to what it is now.

Additionally, dawn, which was between low and high tide, was the preferred time of day. That way, as the high tide came in it would carry the LSTs farther in on the beach, and the men could spot obstacles, such as land mines, more easily.  High winds, heavy seas and low cloud cover were not favorable.  The planners were determined to wait for a day with ideal weather conditions so as to maximize the chances of success for a very risky and dangerous mission.  In fact, the operation was postponed several times before June 6.

As we know, the operation was a success.  Some of the major reasons for this were:

1. The aforementioned missions to deceive the Germans forced them to spread their defenses over a wide area.

2. The “Atlantic Wall” was only about 20% complete.

3. The Allies achieved air superiority quickly.

4. Much of the transportation infrastructure in France had been damaged by Allied bombings and the French resistance, which hampered the Germans’ ability to move men and material.

5. The German high command was disorganized and indecisive.

CONCLUSION

If, as many historians believe, winning WWII was one America’s greatest achievements, then it can be argued that D-Day was one of our greatest victories.  Certainly, its success shortened the war in Europe and, in the process, saved countless lives (combatants and non-combatants alike).

It’s a shame that, with the passage of time, there are so few veterans of this battle still alive to provide first-hand accounts of their D-Day experiences.  There is no definitive count, but most estimates are that only a few thousand worldwide are still alive. Even the youngest ones are in their 90s.

Each year, thousands of people, including many surviving veterans who are able, visit the area to pay their respects to those who gave their lives. Special commemorative events are held not only in Normandy but also at other locations in the US, Canada and the UK, among others. As I said above, this year marks the 80th anniversary of that historic and pivotal battle, and it is viewed as a special anniversary. According to NBC News it is expected that various world leaders including the US’s Joe Biden, Frances’s Emmanuel Macron, Britain’s Prince William, and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky will attend. As an aside, it is a shame that with the passage of time the historical significance of this battle is fading.

In WWII we had a clear-cut goal, win the war; the nation was united in support of the war, our government and our troops; we knew who the enemy was; we knew the Axis Powers were evil (Hitler, in particular, was one of the most despicable men ever to walk the face of the earth.); and there was no holding back.  Sadly, we have never had such clarity of purpose again, and, perhaps, we never will.